[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lowell wind ruling contested 

Credit:  Written by Dave Gram, The Associated Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 16 June 2011 ~~

Supporters and opponents of the Lowell Mountain wind-power project planned for northern Vermont are protesting the recent approval of the project.

In filings at the state Public Service Board, project developer Green Mountain Power Corp. said the board is requiring it to bring specialized public-safety equipment to the construction site prematurely.

The company, which wants to build 21 wind-power turbines more than 400 feet tall on a ridge in Lowell, also is asking that the board change a condition requiring it to acquire land easements for new wildlife habitat before construction begins; it wants the deadline instead to be before operation of the project begins.

In papers filed with the board Tuesday, GMP asked the board to amend its May 31 order approving the project by changing the deadlines for when four conditions of more than 40 conditions issued with that order need to be met, and dropping a fifth condition.

The neighboring towns of Albany and Craftsbury, meanwhile, are arguing in papers filed with the board that its ruling would allow the project to make too much noise, to stay within the standard adopted by the board from the World Health Organization.

“Allowing a project that, at the outset, has not shown it can meet a necessary health standard cannot be in the public good and the Board must reconsider its decision given that the Project would not meet the relevant standard,” Jared Margolis, a lawyer for the two towns, wrote in a request for the board to reconsider its approval.

Much of the debate over the project during hearings before the board concerned its impacts on wildlife. GMP and co-developer Vermont Electric Cooperative said they would acquire nearby land easements and try to create new wildlife habitats to replace areas being disturbed by the wind towers and roads leading to them.

Despite skepticism voiced by environmentalists, the board largely approved that strategy, but said as one of the conditions for its approval that the easements had to be obtained before construction could begin.

In its request for consideration, GMP asked that the deadline not be before construction, but before the wind turbines began operating and making electricity.

Margolis objected strongly in an interview Wednesday to the proposed change in deadline, as did Annette Smith, executive director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment.

Margolis and Smith argued that if GMP tried and failed to get easements from neighboring land owners after construction, the existing wildlife habitats would have been disturbed and millions of dollars may have been spent on the project only to have it ending up being blocked.

“They expected to be able to build the whole thing and not until they were ready to throw the switch” would the company resolve the wildlife issues, Smith said. “You can’t put back the hydrology of a mountain.”

Smith said GMP was pushing for an Aug. 1 start date for construction because the project has to be completed by the end of 2012 to be eligible for federal tax credits, a situation that she contended was resulting in GMP’s trying to move too fast.

GMP spokeswoman Dorothy Schnure confirmed in an interview that the company is hoping to begin construction by Aug. 1 and to have the project up and running by the end of next year to be eligible for federal tax credits that expire at the end of 2012.

Asked whether the project remains financially viable if the tax credits aren’t available, Schnure said, “I don’t have an answer for that at this point. Our plan is to get it done by then.”

Source:  Written by Dave Gram, The Associated Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 16 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky