[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Holyoke debates the wind: power, revenue and beauty  

Credit:  By Mike Plaisance, The Republican, www.masslive.com 14 June 2011 ~~

Energy, money and the beauty of Mount Tom were among the issues officials were considering in an ongoing public hearing about whether to harness the power of wind.

The City Council Ordinance Committee and the Planning Board Tuesday decided to continue to June 28 a hearing on whether to establish an ordinance to regulate wind energy facilities.

The Ordinance Committee before that held a public hearing on a related proposal. The Holyoke Gas and Electric Department wants a special permit to build a 300-foot-tall tower that would be used to gather data about wind on Mount Tom.

Residents and others spoke about both issues at public hearings at City Hall.

James M. Lavelle, Gas and Electric Department manager, said the tower would collect information that could help officials decide whether to lease property the department owns on the mountain to wind-energy firms.

That would help the city by providing another energy source and potentially lowering rates, he said.

Lavelle also assured those who expressed concerns that building such a tower and access road would harm the mountain’s environment, animals and plants.

“We are in lock-step with them” about such concerns, he said.

Stephen M. Rosenbush said he bought a house on Northampton Street in 2009 after searching the East Coast because of the lure of Mount Tom’s beauty.

Rosenbush, who said later he was a semi-retired advertising executive who had lived in New York City, cautioned during the hearing that wind-power could be considered a trend and a poor investment that could harm a city asset.

“We can do it technologically, but is it a good idea?” Rosenbush said.

William F. Welch, of Martin Street, asked why the Gas and Electric Department couldn’t get the wind data it needed from existing telecommunications towers or an old University of Massachusetts wind turbine on Mount Tom used specifically for wind research.

“I don’t think wind has changed that much over the years,” Welch said.

Lavelle and other officials said the existing structures are only up to 200 feet high, which is too low to gather data to show private companies whether their facilities would be effective.

Joshua B. Knox of the Trustees of Reservations’ Pioneer Valley branch was among those urging a no vote on the tower request.

“We believe that the proposed project will not adequately protect the resources of Mount Tom …,” Knox said.

Still, said Kathleen G. Anderson, director of the city Office of Planning and Development, it is important that the city have wind-facility regulations regardless of the Gas and Electric Department proposal for a tower. The city is trying to increase its supply of low-cost, renewable energy because that can help in attracting new businesses and jobs, she said.

“A wind ordinance is prudent whether the (department) moves forward with a project or not,” Anderson said.

Source:  By Mike Plaisance, The Republican, www.masslive.com 14 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter