[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

New fears over wind farm plan  

Credit:  By Chris Fay, Reporter (Sedgefield), The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 2 June 2011 ~~

Concerns over a scheme that could see England’s biggest wind farm built in the region were voiced during a public meeting last night.

E.ON is carrying out tests to determine if farmland east of Newton Aycliffe, in County Durham, is suitable for between 25 and 45 turbines, each generating 2MW.

The energy firm published details of the scheme, known as the Isles, online, but later removed them, saying they were published in error.

However, the apparent blunder sparked concern from residents, which was expressed during a public meeting in Chilton Catholic Club, last night.

Phil Wilson, MP for Sedgefield, who called the meeting, said the area is saturated with wind farms and developers were still coming forward with plans for more.

Ged Lawson, senior landscape architect for Durham County Council, said the problem was the area had been designated an area of “least constraint” in the regional spatial strategy to encourage development and hit renewable energy targets.

However, Mr Lawson said County Durham had already hit its targets for 2020 and a further local document had suggested the Isles site is only suitable for six turbines.

But Mr Wilson said: “What you do if you’re E.ON is you go for broke and you say that you are going to put between 25 and 45 turbines there and that means the development is more than 50MW and the decision is made by the Government and taken out of our hands.”

Residents voiced concerns over the efficiency of wind turbines, but the meeting heard that efficiency, while still up for debate, was not a planning consideration.

One man called for the use of hydro-electric power instead of wind turbines, saying: “We’ve got plenty of rivers that flow all day long, why don’t they put something less intrusive in them?”

However, Mr Lawson said the problem with hydro-electric power is that, relatively speaking, it does not produce a great deal of energy, and that the key was a balanced approach to renewable energy using wind, hydro-electricity schemes and biomass power stations.

E.ON was not present at the meeting last night, nor at a meeting in Sedgefield on Friday evening, but the firm has said it has no proper plans in place and it is too early for consultations.

Mr Wilson said he had received some emails in support of the scheme, but said during last Friday’s meeting, in Ceddesfeld Hall, people were generally against the plan.

Meanwhile, Irish-based the Electricity Supply Board (ESB), has admitted the £30m West Durham Wind Farm, near Tow Law, County Durham, has broken down.

It is the North-East’s biggest wind farm and produces power for 15,700 homes, but ESB could not say when it will be running again.

A spokesman said “a local network outage” caused the wind farm to shut down on May 18 and an inspection revealed that there was further work to be done.

He said: “The wind farm will return to service when this remediation work is complete.”

A third public meeting to discuss the Isles wind farm scheme takes place tonight, at 6.30pm, in the Xcel Centre, Long Tens Way, Aycliffe Business Park, County Durham.

Source:  By Chris Fay, Reporter (Sedgefield), The Northern Echo, www.thenorthernecho.co.uk 2 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.