[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm debate goes on  

Credit:  JANINE RANKIN, Manawatu Standard, www.stuff.co.nz 1 June 2011 ~~

The process of granting resource consent for the Turitea Wind Farm to go ahead will involve another round of submissions, but not a formal hearing.

Developer Mighty River Power wants to put an extra 12 turbines in the areas that the board of inquiry that heard the application said were suitable in its draft decision, released in February.

Its original application was “called in” as a matter of national importance to be heard by a board rather than by the Palmerston North City Council.

The board’s draft decision would, in effect, cut a path right through the middle of the proposed wind farm, in order to protect the view of the skyline from Palmerston North.

The draft decision would allow 60 turbines, many fewer than the 104 applied for, and Mighty River Power said in its response that the board should consider allowing the extra dozen to make the wind farm viable.

It said the board had made an uninformed and unsupported assumption that the wind farm would still be economically sustainable with just 60 turbines.

It challenged the board to resume the hearing that was never closed, only adjourned.

The power company said the board would be breaching the principles of natural justice and fairness if it did not allow another round of comment.

There were 36 submitters who did not have a chance to comment on Mighty River Power’s revised plan before submissions on the draft decision closed late last month. The board agreed in a memo this week that it would consider the fresh proposal, and that other interested parties should have a chance to comment.

Those people now have several days to make submissions, which close on June 20.

The board heard 10 weeks of evidence over nine months ending in March last year.

Source:  JANINE RANKIN, Manawatu Standard, www.stuff.co.nz 1 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch