LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Eyre Peninsula wind power plan dealt a blow 

Credit:  Belinda Willis, The Advertiser, www.adelaidenow.com.au 31 May 2011 ~~

Plans to generate thousands of megawatts of wind power from the Eyre Peninsula have received a blow.

RenewablesSA Commissioner Tim O’Loughlin said a crucial rule change by the key regulatory body blocked a new incentive for companies to develop one of Australia’s best wind resources and it was “flawed”.

Developers had hoped the change would mean consumers would underwrite part of the estimated $613 million cost to build a transmission line from Port Augusta to Eyre Peninsula.

“We think this is a blinkered and short-sighted decision,” Mr O’Loughlin said.

He said South Australia was by far the most affected by the ruling, as other states did not have the same opportunity to tap high-quality wind resources at the edge of the national grid.

A RenewablesSA GreenGrid report had identified a potential 2000MW of wind power on Eyre Peninsula, compared to the state’s existing installed wind power capacity of 1018MW.

At the moment, wind farm developers pay the full cost of Electranet installing a transmission line.

The suggested rule change would have allowed a wind-farm developer to contribute to the cost of the transmission line based on a portion of the projected 2000MW that they expected to produce.

Remaining costs would be recouped by Electranet for consumers as other developers came on line.

Mr O’Loughlin said most developers would not now risk such a large investment up front.

The Australian Energy Market Commission was originally asked by the Ministerial Council on Energy in 2010 to consider allowing energy generators to have consumers partially underwrite transmission line costs.

Its draft determination “stunned everybody by saying we don’t want to look at any of the five options,” Mr O’Loughlin said.

The options were variations on consumers bearing some of the initial costs.

Mr O’Loughlin argued that the cost of building wind farms under existing grid lines was continually rising as the best wind generation sites were already taken and new, tougher rules on siting turbines closer to housing were making them less economic.

“In Eyre Peninsula, what you’ve got is an area with lots of wind that’s the size of Tasmania with the population of 55,000 people.

“There are ideal sites in sparsely populated inland areas,” he said.

The draft determination would now receive submissions, including one by Mr O’Loughlin with Acciona Energy, Transfield Services, Origin and Pacific Hydro.

But Mr O’Loughlin said the final ruling – which is due to be made by June 30 – was unlikely to be changed.

He believed the need for extra renewable energy would eventually make the economics work for Eyre Peninsula.

“They say they don’t want to subject consumers to the risk of having to pay for surplus transmission capacity,” Mr O’Loughlin said.

“My complaint is that they don’t recognise the opposite set of risks which is the opportunity of tapping resources like Eyre Peninsula and the rising cost of wind energy production in the existing framework.”

Source:  Belinda Willis, The Advertiser, www.adelaidenow.com.au 31 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky