[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Better deal for Rumford  

Credit:  www.sunjournal.com 27 May 2011 ~~

Recently, the Rumford Board of Selectmen voted 3-2 to put the Rumford wind ordinance on the June ballot. Many questions remain unanswered by the board concerning its actions pertaining to that ordinance.

One of these questions is in regard to the decommissioning funds. Should the towers cease to function or the company that owns them ceases to exist, decommissioning funds are money set aside to remove the towers that are taller than the tallest stack at the Rumford paper mill.

This type of funding is commonplace throughout the wind industry. The majority of the Rumford board believes it is fair to wait 10 years before this funding is in place. Dixfield’s wind power ordinance requires funding to be in place no later than three years into the project. The proposed Bethel regional ordinance requires funding be in place before a permit will even be issued.

First Wind LLC, the developer that has shown interest in Rumford, has offered other communities (where First Wind proposed wind farms) $50,000 per year, starting in year one, to be set aside. Why are Selectmen Bradford Adley, Mark Belanger and Jeffrey Sterling expecting less for Rumford taxpayers than other surrounding officials are expecting for their communities?

Time and time again, members of the board have used the word “fair.” They need to be fair and protect Rumford citizens, not just the developer.

I will vote “no” on the Rumford wind ordinance.

Peter Buotte Jr., Rumford

Source:  www.sunjournal.com 27 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.