[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm test mast rejected 

Credit:  Bridlington Free Press, www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk 5 May 2011 ~~

Campaigners against a proposed wind farm on the edge of the Wolds between Burton Fleming and Hunmanby got a taste of victory when Scarborough councillors threw out plans for a wind testing mast.

About 50 protesters with placards gathered outside Scarborough Town Hall ahead of a planning meeting last Thursday.

The protesters – including some from Burton Fleming – were there to show their objection to plans for the mast.

The test mast would be used by Banks Renewables to gauge the suitability of the site for a development of up to 14 large wind turbines.

The campaigners packed the public gallery of the main council chamber, while others sat downstairs to listen to the debate, which lasted more than an hour.

Hertford ward councillor Godfrey Allanson made a plea on behalf of the campaigners, who were also represented by Coun Michelle Donohue-Moncrieff, vice-chairman of Hunmanby Parish Council and chairman of the No To Wolds Wind Farm group.

Phil Dyke, development director for Banks Renewables, spoke in favour of the plans, reiterating the point made by planning officers that the application had to be judged on its own merits, independent of any future plans for a wind farm.

As various speakers were jeered or applauded, committee chairman Coun Jane Mortimer responded by threatening the audience with expulsion.

However, the campaigners were allowed to stay until a majority decision was reached to reject the planning application.

The decision was made against the advice of planning officers.

“We’re absolutely delighted”, said Steve Hey, of Fordon.

Source:  Bridlington Free Press, www.bridlingtonfreepress.co.uk 5 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon