[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Minnesota Legislature: Senate panel hears wind power debate  

Credit:  By: Don Davis, INFORUM, www.inforum.com 6 May 2011 ~~

ST. PAUL – A Senate committee took no stand Thursday to restrict wind power farms.

A bill by Sen. John Howe, R-Red Wing, said there is only a remote chance that his bill requiring that wind turbines be a half-mile from property lines will pass this year, but a task force likely will discuss the issue before next year’s legislative session.

A pair of Goodhue County residents who want stiffer rules on where wind turbines may be built and farmers from other parts of the state who say that is too restrictive took part in an hour-long debate in front of the Senate energy committee.

Kristie Rosenquist and Paul Reese supported the Howe bill to require that turbines be at least half a mile from properties not associated with a wind farm.

Industrial-sized wind turbines do not belong in areas with homes, Rosenquist said, because they produce low-intensity noise, cause headaches, produce “shadow flicker” from turbines turning in front of the sun and emit stray electricity.

Rosenquist and Reese are involved in a fight about a proposed wind farm. The case involving a Goodhue County ordinance that some say is too restrictive awaits a state Public Utilities Commission hearing.

Paynesville-area dairy farmer Ken Schefers said the Howe proposal would take excessive amounts of land out of consideration for wind farms. The bill would “absolutely end wind power,” Olmstead County farmer John Meyer added.

“You chose to hold out the open or close for business sign in Minnesota,” Meyer said.

But, Reese said, it is more important to give people a choice “what they want to live with.”

Land-rights attorney Dan Schleck said wind farm decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, and supported a statewide standard. The Howe bill would provide more predictability for both developers and neighbors, he said.

Special session talk

A key House Republican did not like Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton talking about a possible special legislative session.

“Gov. Dayton’s a good man, and he’s already shown leadership on several legislative issues this year,” House Tax Chairman Greg Davids, R-Preston, said Thursday. “But as I said in tax committee this morning: Governor, please don’t quit. Please don’t give up; 17 days is a lifetime, we can make this work. Please don’t quit.”

In answering reporters’ questions this week, Dayton said his optimism about finishing the legislative on time is waning.

The state Constitution requires the Legislature to adjourn by May 23, but Dayton could call lawmakers back to a special session if funding bills are not done by then.

The next deadline is June 30, when the current budget ends. If there is not a budget deal by then, parts of state government could shut down.

House-Senate conference committees are meeting this week to work out differences between spending bills the two chambers have passed. Dayton insists that Republican legislative leaders finish those negotiations before he gets involved.

Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch, R-Buffalo, said conferees will continue to meet, and the full Senate will meet every day next week, probably including Saturday.

“There is enough time in session to get this done,” Deputy Senate Majority Leader Geoff Michel, R-Edina, said.

However, he added, Dayton needs to get involved in negotiations soon.

“We need a governor who is going to lead, not commentating,” Michel said.

Photo ID passes

The House approved a bill 73-59 that would require Minnesotans to show a photographic identification before voting.

Senators already passed a similar measure, so slight differences need to be to be negotiated before the bill goes to Gov. Mark Dayton. The Democratic governor says he will only sign election-related changes if they have strong bipartisan backing, but the House and Senate votes were one-sided, with mostly Republicans in favor.

Representatives amended the bill to include one provision Dayton wanted: to require politicians to report contributions and spending even during non-election years.

Bill sponsor Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer, R-Big Lake, said that if Dayton vetoes the bill, a constitutional amendment likely will be attempted. The governor does not have to approve a constitutional amendment; instead, it goes directly from the Legislature to voters in the November 2012 election.

Variances OK’d

Gov. Mark Dayton signed a bill Thursday restoring local governments’ ability to grant zoning variances.

The new law, which the House and Senate earlier passed unanimously, says local governments may allow variances to zoning ordinances when strictly following an ordinance would be difficult. For instance, a variance could allow a garage to be built closer to the property line than ordinances otherwise would allow.

The Minnesota Supreme Court overturned an existing law that allowed variances.

Federal planning

Minnesota legislators deal with state issues, but one lawmaker says they also need to consider the federal government, too.

Rep. Keith Downey, R-Edina, today takes a bill in front of committee to require state leaders to consider federal budget woes when drawing up budgets.

State agencies would need to draw up contingency funds in case there is a federal budget crisis.

Source:  By: Don Davis, INFORUM, www.inforum.com 6 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.