LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind company favors old law 

Credit:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, SUNDAY, MAY 1, 2011, watertowndailytimes.com ~~

HAMMOND – Iberdrola Renewables last week asked the Town Council to keep in place its “reasonable” wind law and not adopt the recommendations of the town’s wind advisory committee.

The company, which wants to build its Stone Church Wind project in the town, believes the town’s existing law “is reasonable and consistent with the majority of 15 operating wind farms in New York state,” said spokeswoman Jenny L. Burke.

The wind advisory committee’s recommendations – addressing sound limits, property setbacks and a requirement that Iberdrola reimburse owners who believe a wind farm would lower their property value – essentially would kill the project, Ms. Burke said.

“If you take the committee’s recommendations as is, you’re eliminating a project before a site-specific plan and our environmental impact statement have even been produced,” she said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Coupled with more intensive studies that will meet any regulations set forth by the state Department of Environmental Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or state Department of Agriculture and Markets, Ms. Burke said, Iberdrola could “offset any negative impacts” with the money and jobs such a project would generate.

“You would basically be not allowing us to give you a proposal to consider,” she said.

Town Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram asked Ms. Burke why the recommendations would preclude wind development.

“The setbacks and sound standards alone would eliminate a project,” Ms. Burke said.

Town attorney Joseph W. Russell said he had concerns about whether the so-called “Real Property Value Guarantee” clause recommended by the wind committee would be enforceable.

He said such a clause would lack teeth – it would require both the property owner and developer to sign onto it voluntarily – and could open the town to litigation.

The board voted 3-0 to have Mr. Russell present language that would work the property value agreement into the town’s wind law.

The board will continue its review of wind advisory committee recommendations at 7 p.m. Monday and 7 p.m. May 16 at Town Hall.

Source:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, SUNDAY, MAY 1, 2011, watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky