[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind company favors old law  

Credit:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, SUNDAY, MAY 1, 2011, watertowndailytimes.com ~~

HAMMOND – Iberdrola Renewables last week asked the Town Council to keep in place its “reasonable” wind law and not adopt the recommendations of the town’s wind advisory committee.

The company, which wants to build its Stone Church Wind project in the town, believes the town’s existing law “is reasonable and consistent with the majority of 15 operating wind farms in New York state,” said spokeswoman Jenny L. Burke.

The wind advisory committee’s recommendations – addressing sound limits, property setbacks and a requirement that Iberdrola reimburse owners who believe a wind farm would lower their property value – essentially would kill the project, Ms. Burke said.

“If you take the committee’s recommendations as is, you’re eliminating a project before a site-specific plan and our environmental impact statement have even been produced,” she said.
ADVERTISEMENT

Coupled with more intensive studies that will meet any regulations set forth by the state Department of Environmental Conservation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or state Department of Agriculture and Markets, Ms. Burke said, Iberdrola could “offset any negative impacts” with the money and jobs such a project would generate.

“You would basically be not allowing us to give you a proposal to consider,” she said.

Town Supervisor Ronald W. Bertram asked Ms. Burke why the recommendations would preclude wind development.

“The setbacks and sound standards alone would eliminate a project,” Ms. Burke said.

Town attorney Joseph W. Russell said he had concerns about whether the so-called “Real Property Value Guarantee” clause recommended by the wind committee would be enforceable.

He said such a clause would lack teeth – it would require both the property owner and developer to sign onto it voluntarily – and could open the town to litigation.

The board voted 3-0 to have Mr. Russell present language that would work the property value agreement into the town’s wind law.

The board will continue its review of wind advisory committee recommendations at 7 p.m. Monday and 7 p.m. May 16 at Town Hall.

Source:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, SUNDAY, MAY 1, 2011, watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: