[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Vermont House drops vote on energy surcharge  

Credit:  Written by Terri Hallenbeck, Free Press Staff Writer, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 7 April 2011 ~~

A couple hours before the House was expected to approve a 55-cent monthly charge on Vermonters’ electric bills to pay for renewable-energy projects, Gov. Peter Shumlin declared he had a better idea, prompting lawmakers to yank the fee out of the legislation.

The charge would fuel the state’s Clean Energy Development Fund.

Shumlin refused to elaborate on his “better idea,” saying, “It’s not ready for prime time.” He later said he wants to find a funding source that won’t affect electric rates, and he expects to have something to announce next week.

Shumlin’s new plan surprised House Speaker Shap Smith, D-Morristown, whose chamber had wrangled over the 55-cent charge Tuesday and expected further debate Wednesday. That discussion never happened, as lawmakers pulled the fee before passing the energy bill.

Although Smith and Shumlin are Democrats who have worked almost in lock-step this legislative session, Smith said Shumlin didn’t talk to him about a change in plans for the Clean Energy Development Fund. Smith said the idea for the 55-cent charge came from the Public Service Department, which answers to Shumlin.

Public Service Commissioner Liz Miller said her department calculated that 55 cents would cover the amount needed in the fund and said the department could live with it but would prefer another funding source.

Rep. Kurt Wright, R-Burlington, said lawmakers spent considerable time on the controversial fee and were under the impression Shumlin supported it.

The fund relies on a tax on Vermont Yankee’s power generation, which would end next year if the plant shuts down, as Shumlin wants it to.

Source:  Written by Terri Hallenbeck, Free Press Staff Writer, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 7 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter