[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Anti-wind group questions ability to ‘do wind right’ 

Credit:  The Irregular, www.theirregular.com 6 April 2011 ~~

WILTON – Friends of Maine’s Mountains, an organization dedicated to protecting both the Maine economy and Maine environment from proliferation of industrial wind power, recently asked for better critical thinking by advocates and policy makers.

Thursday, March 31, Maine Audubon and the Appalachian Mountain Club, Maine Chapter, co-sponsored Doing Wind Right, a public forum with a panel of speakers representing environmental groups and the wind lobby. The question being asked to prompt the forum’s discussion was: “How might Maine develop land-based wind power as a renewable energy source while protecting ecological health and natural heritage?”

In response to that forum, an FMM spokesperson said that the group appreciates the tacit acknowledgement that wind power has shortcomings. However, FMM asserts that the forum begins with the wrong question.

“Why are we asking how we might proliferate a high impact, low benefit electricity generation source,” said FMM Government Relations Director Chris O’Neil, “When we should first be asking why might we do it?”

According to FMM, its publications show that wind power is an ineffective electricity generation source, made less viable and essentially irrelevant when sited in the challenging topography of Maine’s remote mountains.

According to Steve Thurston, co-Chair of Citizens Task Force on Wind Power, the Legislature never critically asked why utilize wind when it enacted the Wind Act in 2008.

“True critical thinking,” said Thurston, “would be enhanced if this forum’s panel included an engineer and an economist who could explain how much goes in, and how little comes out of this energy modality.”

“We appreciate the emerging sensitivity to wind power’s impacts, as evidenced by the very question being asked at this forum,” said O’Neil. “However, they need to honestly quantify and qualify wind power’s negligible benefits or we will be set back to where we were two years ago, before Maine started to wake up to this bad deal.”

For more information about Friends of Maine’s Mountains, visit the Web site www.friendsofmainesmountains.com.

Source:  The Irregular, www.theirregular.com 6 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky