[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy rules set  

Credit:  By Larry Shields, salemnews.net 22 March 2011 ~~

SALEM – A wind energy ordinance will be forwarded to city council after the rules and ordinance committee put the finishing touches on it Monday.

Chairman John Berlin said numerous changes and revisions were made and Housing, Planning and Zoning Officer Pat Morrissey reviewed the committee’s working copy of definitions, decibel criteria, the number of turbines allowed on a site and fees.

The two types were defined as large, open-blade turbines and small fan, or “gearless blade-tip” design units with a shroud and with a blade no larger than six feet in diameter.

The smaller units will be allowed in any zone.

“That way a small business can put one up,” he said, with the board of zoning appeals determining the number at any single location.

Berlin said that was a good idea since some businesses don’t have the acreage for the large turbine units.

Large units have a proposed blade height set at 30 feet above the foundation and the system cannot generate more than 45 dB in noise 100 feet from the foundation.

The small systems have a dB of 35.

Councilman Bret Apple said he didn’t know much about how they operated regarding the decibels and Morrissey said, “If you can hear it 80 feet away it’s considered noise.”

The committee put the setback for the smaller units at 25 feet, a change from 70 feet.

“That seems reasonable,” Berlin said.

“The point of it is,” Morrissey said, “you don’t want it sitting on somebody’s property line …”

The small units put out 2.5 kilowatts, Morrissey said, noting that future models will produce more electricity and because of that, “they may get a little noisier.”

He added, “We’ll find out … if it’s a justifiable problem, we’ll find out. We’re ahead of it.

Apple asked about the criminal and civil aspects in the ordinance and Morrissey said the law director advised that it should be included.

“What would they be charged with?” Apple asked and wondered how it would be determined when the unit was last used.

Morrissey said the last used issue could be determined by the connection with the power company and if the annual fee was not paid.

“An indication of it not being used would be not reapplying for a permit,” he said, adding a they probably wouldn’t pay the liability insurance which is a requirement on the application.

Source:  By Larry Shields, salemnews.net 22 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.