[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Don’t disregard science and destroy a fragile environment  

Credit:  The Chronicle, 9 March 2011 ~~

I am writing to oppose the forward movement by the Governor for the Lowell wind project.

In an apparent effort to offer an alternative to Vermont Yankee, it seems that Governor Shumlin has decided to disregard science to support a project that will destroy a fragile environment forever.

Opponents of the Lowell project support renewable energy solutions- we just don’t support THIS wind project, which is out of proportion and inappropriate for Vermont. I have four issues:

1. Exploitation of impoverished towns – these proposals would never have been suggested for Stowe or Woodstock. The power brokers in charge of big business are trying (and succeeding) in throwing a few dollars into local tax coffers to buy support. I find this very offensive.

2. The towers themselves – reported to be erected are up to 39 turbines, each 460 feet tall. The Washington Monument is 555 feet tall, these are 82% of that height. Try to imagine this- a pristine wooded ridgeline with miles of mammoth cement and metal structures.

3. The night lights – anyone who has been shocked by the flashing red lights of the “test towers” can only imagine the enormity of the impact of 39 towers at night. The lights are visible for many miles, at unexpected angles, and we are only seeing two illuminated sites. Proponents of the project can laugh and trivialize my concern for aesthetics, but I did not move to Albany to look at flashing red night lights in the sky, which I could have found at an airport. One great pleasure of rural life is viewing stars in the pitch black sky, visitors from urban areas are always amazed at the unspoiled environment here.

4. The natural environment – it is obscene in my opinion to allow the northeast kingdom to lose another precious area of plant and animal habitat. To blow up and bulldoze miles of forest, wetlands, and wildlife corridors demonstrates either ignorance or disregard for the creatures who cannot speak for themselves.

Trash this obscenity and think smaller- think Vermont size.

Linda Libby


Source:  The Chronicle, 9 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.