[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Withdraw plan for wind farm say protesters  

Credit:  By Lewis Rudd, The Wokingham Times, www.getwokingham.co.uk 2 March 2011 ~~

Protestors fighting plans for a four-turbine wind farm on land near Arborfield are calling for the blueprints to be withdrawn after hearing fresh information will be submitted.

The team behind plans to install four wind turbines at Rushy Mead, which is sandwiched between Arborfield, Lower Earley and Shinfield, is to add further information to the planning application it handed over to Wokingham Borough Council last year.

It is understood the applicant, Partnerships for Renewables (PfR), will submit the additional paperwork within the next two weeks.

According to a company spokesman, the information relates to additional findings attempting to address any on-site fears about flooding.

It also contains comments and answers to questions raised to the team at public consultation sessions held last year with residents living in the areas around the wind farm.

PfR submitted a planning application to the council in October last year seeking permission to install the wind turbines at the University of Reading-owned site.

However, representatives of Householders Against Rushy Mead (HARM), who are campaigning against the development, believe residents should be fully consulted about the additional information before planning bosses are able to make a formal decision.

The group claims an opportunity to make an outright decision on the application has been deferred on at least three occasions in the past.

And Jan Heard, who is a member of HARM, voiced her frustration over the repeated delays surrounding the application.

She said: “The decision date on this planning application has already been postponed three times and we are told it might be postponed again.

“This application should be withdrawn, rather than be deferred again.”

Mrs Heard went on to explain how the application, as she understands, is to be discussed by the planning committeeon Wednesday, March 30.

She claims, however, that feedback received by the group suggests the application could be deferred from this meeting.

Marcia Head, development management team leader at the council, denied such suggestions.

“As we do not know when [the new information] will be received we cannot say for certain which meeting the application will be reported to.

“The application has not been previously been deferred from any meetings.”

Source:  By Lewis Rudd, The Wokingham Times, www.getwokingham.co.uk 2 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.