[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hidden cost in ‘free’ wind 

Credit:  By Audra Parker, www.bostonherald.com 22 February 2011 ~~

Massachusetts is teaching the nation a valuable lesson on government’s role in creating new green industries – it’s just not the lesson the state’s leadership planned on.

As Evergreen Solar packs its equipment, abandons its state-funded 450,000-square-foot plant and lays off its 800-plus work force, the state is scrambling to try and claw back at least a piece of the $58 million it spent to lure the solar panel manufacturer to a former Air Force base west of Boston.

“Lure” may not be a strong enough word here: Gov. Deval Patrick and then-Energy Secretary Ian Bowles did everything possible for the solar start-up to locate at the former Fort Devens – throwing millions in grants and tax incentives and infrastructure and equipment funding at what any in-depth analysis would have shown was at best a long-shot venture.

Why did the Patrick administration so avidly pursue Evergreen? Because in Massachusetts, when it comes to spending scarce state tax dollars, it is ideology – not due diligence, the prospect for jobs or even common sense – that is the driving force. Now Patrick is embarked on a new green energy mission that promises to create an even greater financial crater for Massachusetts than the one that’s been left by Evergreen.

The governor has pledged to support Cape Wind, the most expensive wind facility ever constructed in the U.S. – at all costs. And for the state’s consumers and small businesses – already paying some of the highest electric rates in the country – that cost happens to be an additional $4 billion tacked on to their electric bills over the next 15 years.

For years Cape Wind developer Jim Gordon told Massachusetts ratepayers that Cape Wind would save them money. Wind is free, right?

But when Cape Wind and Massachusetts’ political leaders had to come clean about the true cost of the project, the public was in for quite a surprise. Under pressure from the Patrick administration, the state’s largest utility, National Grid, inked a no-bid deal with Cape Wind saddling electric ratepayers with billions of dollars in added costs.

Meanwhile, the state’s second largest utility company, NStar [NST], let renewable energy providers compete for their customers the way all businesses do: by offering the lowest price. The result was green energy bids totaling 1,180 megawatts from 35 projects in Massachusetts alone – all at a fraction of the cost of Cape Wind. And an even more recent bidding process opened up to all of New England yielded far more – 113 bids which would deliver 28 times more energy than NStar needs to meet state goals.

According to Cape Wind, its project would produce power at 19 cents per kilowatt hour (kwh) in year one, rising 3.5 percent per year to reach an astounding 30 cents per kwh in the last year of the 15-year contract. By contrast, Maine’s Kibby Mountain is selling its wind energy for a flat 10.5 cents per kwh in a 10-year contract.

If affordable green energy options are available now from neighboring sources, why is Patrick so intent on spending billions in taxpayer and ratepayer dollars turning Nantucket Sound into an industrial park? The real rationale for Evergreen Solar, and the real rationale for Cape Wind, has nothing to do with jobs or green energy. It has to do with ideology. And that’s a poor way to make decisions about taxpayer dollars.

Audra Parker is president and CEO of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound.

Source:  By Audra Parker, www.bostonherald.com 22 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky