[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Franklin County braces for wind ordinance debates 

Credit:  By David Robinson, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.kjonline.com 14 February 2011 ~~

FARMINGTON – Planning board member Tom Eastler waited while a resident voiced his concerns about noise and wind energy projects in Farmington.

Residents had gathered for one of several recent meetings and public hearings tied to wind-energy ordinances that Franklin County towns will present to voters at annual town meetings.

After the resident, Burt Knapp, asked for stricter limits on noise created by wind turbines, Eastler used a sound-pressure meter to defend the proposed law.

Eastler, who helped write the ordinance, used his voice and crinkled paper to show how the device works. Then he said their rather subdued debate had reached decibel levels that are close to the law’s guidelines on turbine noise.

“The room has been less than 50 decibels,” he said, comparing it to the 60-decibel limit on wind turbine noise reaching the closest neighbor’s property line. He said he didn’t think it was enough noise to bother neighbors. Knapp questioned comparing voices and crinkling paper to wind turbine noise, and maintained that Farmington’s proposed wind-energy law didn’t provide enough protection for its residents.

Debates such as this one about turbine noise and other wind-energy issues are expected to continue in Farmington and New Vineyard, where town officials have prepared ordinances to regulate wind energy within their respective borders.

Voters will consider the proposals at annual town meetings in March and April. Selectmen and town officials plan to review public comments and possibly make revisions before final versions are presented to voters.

Temple town officials plan to ask voters at their annual town meeting next month to consider adopting a moratorium on wind-energy projects, according to town officials.

Some town officials and residents view these ordinances as the only local control over wind-energy development. Projects must meet state guidelines but they can also be forced to meet local standards if towns pass ordinances.

Voters in Carthage, for example, rejected attempts to pursue a wind-energy ordinance. Patriot Renewables LLC is currently seeking permits to build 12 wind turbines on Saddleback Mountain in Carthage, and the project and most of the process is being regulated by the state, town selectmen have said.

Knapp, 63, who lives at Porter Hill Farm in Farmington, said he is worried about where turbines would be allowed in Farmington without a town ordinance.

“We have open space near us, and I’m concerned that someone might want to put a turbine up near us,” Knapp said, reached by phone after the hearing.

Knapp’s main concern is turbine noise bothering neighboring property owners. He said Farmington’s law should reflect other town’s that used sound engineers to establish strict noise limits.

Eastler told Knapp that stricter noise limits were not realistic, and that they would make it impossible to build wind-energy systems in town.

Farmington’s ordinance would address many different factors involved in wind-energy, according to Eastler, who is an environmental geology professor at University of Maine at Farmington.

Eastler said he is an advocate for alternative fuels and is involved in wind-energy studies in town, including a study that places a monetary value on wind energy produced near property he owns.

While Eastler said he believes the turbine noise rules are appropriate, wind-energy technology and research is constantly progressing and the town ordinance process allows for changes.

Source:  By David Robinson, Staff Writer, Morning Sentinel, www.kjonline.com 14 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky