Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Residents voice concerns over Vermilion turbine ordinance
Credit: Tracy Moss, The News-Gazette, www.news-gazette.com 8 February 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
DANVILLE – Two Rankin-area residents raised concerns to the Vermilion County Board on Tuesday night about whether the county’s wind ordinance adequately protects the public’s interests in regard to the wind farm that’s planned for northwestern Vermilion County.
Kim and Darrell Cambron asked the board to revisit its wind ordinance that was written about two years ago to regulate the construction of wind turbines. Vermilion County has no zoning.
Darrell Cambron said the ordinance was probably adequate at the time it was written, but new information and research about wind turbines is now available. He encouraged the county board to consider revisiting and tweaking its ordinance before any turbines are approved.
International Power America Inc. is planning to build a 43-turbine wind farm west of Rossville and southeast of Rankin.
Cambron said he would like the ordinance to address possible noise generated by the turbines; shadow flicker – shadows created by the rotating blades – and the potential effect of that flicker on people and wildlife; potential threats to bats and birds; and setback limits. The county’s ordinance requires the turbines to be at least 1,000 feet from any structures, but Cambron said he questions whether that’s adequate. He said officials in areas with turbines are revisiting their setback distances.
The Cambrons asked the county board to consider a moratorium on the approval of any wind turbine development until the county’s ordinance can be revisited with public input.
Darrell Cambron said he doesn’t see what the big rush is to get wind turbines in the ground.
“I feel it’s more important to get it right,” he said.
Also at Tuesday’s meeting, the county board voted 25-0 to approve agreements with Grant Township and Ross Township, where the proposed wind turbine farm would be located. The agreements waive the township zoning processes, so the wind turbine company would seek approval for its project from one government entity, the county, rather than from three, and the county’s ordinance would be the regulating document for that approval process.
County board member Rick Knight asked if the county could tweak its wind ordinance at this point.
Bill Donahue, the county’s attorney, said the ordinance could always be changed, but it would be difficult to do that once a company has submitted its application for a project. International Power America Inc. has already submitted its application to the county.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: