LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lowell Mountain would become state’s largest wind energy development 

Credit:  John Dillon, VPR News, www.vpr.net 3 February 2011 ~~

(Host) The Public Service Board opened hearings Thursday on Green Mountain Power’s plans to harness the wind that blows over a mountain ridge in the Northeast Kingdom.

GMP officials took the stand and outlined the project. They argued it will provide an environmentally friendly source of electricity, and that the project will benefit ratepayers and its major shareholder.

VPR’s John Dillon has more:

(Dillon) If built, the 21 turbines planned for Lowell Mountain would become the state’s largest wind energy development.

The Public Service Board hearings will cover questions of cost, as well as the impact of the development on neighbors and the mountain habitat.

CEO Mary Powell says the over-arching goal of the Lowell project is to provide a renewable energy source for customers.

(Powell) “So much of what informed our thinking on this was because we didn’t want to sort of fall into the traditional thinking of it’s either high prices and green, or lower cost and dirtier. We really challenged ourselves to come up with a strategy where we can move to a clean, green, but cost-effective energy future for our customers.”

(Dillon) Powell said it’s better for GMP to own the project rather than buy wind power from other developers. She compared it to owning your own home rather than paying a landlord.

(Powell) “In essence once the initial capital cost is paid off the energy goes to customers at the actual cost of maintaining and operating those plants.”

(Dillon) Powell also told the Public Service Board that the project will also benefit its main shareholder, the Canadian company GazMet.

The Lowell project has stirred controversy and opposition in the Northeast Kingdom. GMP has promised to pay Lowell about half a million dollars a year. It’s also committed to paying much lesser amounts to several surrounding towns.

Powell says she hopes communities eventually see other benefits as well.

(Powell) “It’s my dream, it’s my hope, it’s my aspiration that there will be a day that actually people in the Northeast Kingdom with great pride and know that they are contributing to you know a reduction to significant carbon.”

(Dillon) But judging from the crowd in the hearing room opponents are not mollified. Among other issues, they’re concerned about noise from the turbines, damage to wildlife habitat and the impact on property values.

Pat O’Neill drove down from Westfield. She says conservation groups previously identified the Lowell mountain range as an important region for wildlife.

(O’Neill) And where this project is proposed is one of six critical linkage areas for habitat in a huge swath of the Northeast, including all of the New England states, upper New York state… all the way out to the Gaspe Pennisula. And to say, ‘Well, you know it really isn’t going to make any difference,’ or “There’s plenty of other space there,’ seems a little cavalier.”

(Dillon) Opponents will get their turn later before the PSB. But O’Neill doesn’t believe the process is fair. She said GMP worked on its application for many months, but local citizen groups and neighboring property owners faced a quick three-week deadline to prepare testimony and witnesses.

For VPR News, I’m John Dillon in Montpelier.

Source:  John Dillon, VPR News, www.vpr.net 3 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky