[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Seeking a balance; Planners discuss wind turbine setback, noise  

Credit:  Jennifer Linn Hartley, Staff Writer, Ludington Daily News, www.ludingtondailynews.com 19 January 2011 ~~

AMBER TWP. – Setbacks and noise levels for wind turbines were the topics of discussion Tuesday for the Mason County Planning Commission, which is now meeting weekly.

The commission is to decide whether to approve a Mason County Zoning Ordinance amendment request proposed by concerned residents, who requested more stringent rules after Consumers Energy proposed 56 nearly 500-foot-tall turbines for the Riverton and Summit townships.

The zoning amendment addresses the group’s concerns with wind farm regulations in the county, including issues with setbacks, flicker, bats and road repairs and maintenance.

Two weeks ago, the commission set meeting dates – weekly for the next few weeks – to go over the amendment.

During Tuesday’s meeting, the commission initially began talking about sound requirements in the zoning ordinance, but shifted to setbacks after deciding the two were related and that setbacks would have an impact on deciding sound levels.

Planning commissioner Bruce Patterson said the setbacks in the current zoning ordinance are too close at two times the height of the turbine, making the setbacks 952 feet for these 476-foot-tall turbines.

The zoning amendment change request calls for setbacks of 1.25 miles – 6,600 feet – from a turbine, a distance which commissioners said might be too far and could eliminate Consumers’ whole project.

Patterson said the minimum setback required should be at least a quarter-mile – 1,320 feet. Another number brought up was 1,500 feet.

The current ordinance setbacks relate directly to the height of the turbine, something the commission also discussed.

The planning commission also discussed having different noise regulations for night and daytime and having a pre-construction sound analysis done on the area.

For the complete story see today’s Daily News.

[rest of article available at source]

Source:  Jennifer Linn Hartley, Staff Writer, Ludington Daily News, www.ludingtondailynews.com 19 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.