[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dead calm for the wind turbine deal?  

Credit:  By Brenna McCabe, Valley Breeze Staff Writer, www.valleybreeze.com ~~

NORTH SMITHFIELD – The winds have died down on all fronts since the new Town Council has taken its place at the head of the table.

Months of jumping hurdles and gaining approvals for an almost-500-foot wind turbine in Dowling Village’s Phase IV may have been a wasted effort, as no one has come forward to the new council with the proposal yet, Town Council President Edward Yazbak indicated this week.

“What I understand is that there was never an agreement between the parties out there,” he said. “It seems like it kind of fell by the wayside, and as far as I know, it’s a dead issue.”

The Breeze reported last month that there was some in-fighting among the investors – Dowling Village Wind and RAM Investments – that might have thrown the deal off the table completely. The previous council, which aimed to purchase open space in the Dowling Village mixed-use development for the turbine, left its spot at the bargaining table for the current council to take over if the investors ever reached the agreement.

Some town officials at the time said investors were worried about the intentions of a new council, which could have overturned the deal even if the previous council had approved it.

This wouldn’t be the first time an incoming council has reversed a land deal. In 2008, the North Smithfield Town Council agreed to purchase the Gold property, off Mattity Road, for $2.8 million. Almost immediately, newly elected council members rescinded the purchase, saying not enough effort had been made to negotiate the purchase price down in a declining economy. Former councilor Paul Leclerc told The Breeze in an interview this summer that when the Gold family tried to sell its 154-acre property, the $2.8 million asking price was to be paid out of the town’s $3-million open space bond in 2008, money approved to be spent by voters in 2006, but the property was appraised for almost $1 million less than the asking price.

Previous to the Nov. 2 elections, council candidates expressed they were open to the idea of discussing the wind turbine with more information, but no one has officially approached the council so far.

About a month ago, Al Brien, of RAM investments, said the town planner had contacted him asking him if he would be in favor of keeping that land as open space instead. Brien told The Breeze he said, “Of course I would.”

Phase IV of the Dowling Village project was originally slated for a 76-unit condominium complex. Two months ago, the town began discussing purchasing open space in the Dowling Village mixed-use development for the turbine, essentially negotiating two purchase-and-sales agreements so the town and the North Smithfield Land Trust could jointly preserve 40 acres adjacent to the southeast corner of Booth Pond. The town would separately own 2.5 acres of land for the turbine and lease it to the developers.

The $7-million turbine would supply electricity to tenants of Dowling Village by creating power in the range of 3 million to 4 million kilowatt hours per year.

Under the turbine plan, the town would pay for the 40 acres of open space by tapping $525,000 from an already-approved open space bond. That would be repaid over 20 years using a portion of the $40,000-per-year lease payments from the developer to the town, passed through RAM Investments.

Before the previous Town Council dissipated, town officials said DV Wind asked RAM for a last-minute 50 percent match for road construction that’s part of the project so they have some kind of reimbursement if the new Town Council decides the deal is not something it wants to pursue.

RAM did not agree to it, former councilor Steven Biron told The Breeze. And, he added, DV Wind has until Dec. 31 to start clearing trees for road construction near the turbine or it will not be eligible for tax credits. It was unclear if the deal could still go through if DV Wind goes past that deadline.

Source:  By Brenna McCabe, Valley Breeze Staff Writer, www.valleybreeze.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.