[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Other side of the story  

Credit:  www.northfieldnews.com 7 December 2010 ~~

There are always two sides to every story and I welcome Bruce Anderson’s critique of my concerns regarding adverse health effects from industrial-sized wind turbines. However I find his using the Chief Medical Officer of Health of Ontario (Dr. Arlene King) as a basis to back up his statements problematic.

Three points of contention: First, in the very report Mr. Anderson is using to support his claims Dr. King states that “the minimum setback for a wind turbine is 550 metres (1,804 feet) from a receptor. The setbacks rise with the number of turbines and the sound level rating of the selected turbines.” So if you agree with Dr. King then the Spring Creek Wind Conditional Use Permit should be denied because there are five families’ front doors anywhere from 1,300 to 1,647 feet from one of the proposed turbines.

Second, Dr. King used the World Health Organization’s nighttime decibel cutoff of 40 db when many experts/countries feel you should use 35 db in a rural setting like Northfield (e.g. Australia, France and Germany).

Third, Dr. Hazel Lynn (Ministry of Health Grey-Bruce) and Dr. Ray Copes (Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion), who consulted with Dr. King as she prepared her review, questioned her final release. “The whole section that a couple of us really wanted in there on community health and community disruption went. It’s not in there. I suspect politically she can’t criticize another ministry, so I was a little disappointed,” Lynn said. “I think it’s a fair comment that there is other material that could have been in the report and wasn’t,” said Dr. Ray Copes, the director of environmental and occupational health at the OAHPP and another member of the committee that reviewed drafts of the report.

There are a multitude of resolutions put forward by 73 municipalities in Ontario against wind development (there are about 350 municipalities in Ontario). Ontarians are not happy with Dr. King’s stance on wind turbines’ effects on health, and neither should we be.

Gary Carlson, M.D.

Source:  www.northfieldnews.com 7 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.