[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind carries false promises  

Credit:  By Karen Scott, The Roanoke Times, www.roanoke.com 29 November 2010 ~~

Many things sound great at first: for instance, industrial-sized wind turbines disguised as clean energy.

Roanoke County will soon decide if property values will be severely diminished for more than 271 parcels of land and nearly 12,000 acres in Southwest Roanoke County, not including the proposed turbine site property or Montgomery County properties (including former state Sen. Madison Marye’s estate).

All this land, including part of the community center and new academy, is within a conservative two-mile radius of each proposed wind turbine. Why two miles? In mountains, sound travels farther from updrafts and downdrafts. Low-frequency sound radiates from wind turbines for two to three miles, causing vibration of structures (houses) and resulting in insomnia for residents when turbines turn. Sleep deprivation causes great stress and declining health.

A new idea can equal great problems, in this case: an increase in electric bills throughout the region, multimillion-dollar projects heavily subsidized by taxpayers, the threat of severe ridgetop erosion and siltation pollution, spring displacement, quarter-mile ice throws from 100-foot rotating blades and sleeplessness for hundreds.

And the wind farm would bring about no real coal reduction, net only one or two new jobs and create a headache for AEP: inefficient, unreliable source of electricity, that threatens surges, has no storage capacity and produces energy when demands are least (night and winter).

Catawba is another likely place for these 450-foot eyesores (13 stories taller than Roanoke’s 21-story Wachovia tower). What about placements on North Mountain, Masons Knob, Read Mountain, Fort Lewis Mountain? The Appalachians’ unsustained winds are inefficient for industrial wind turbine use.

In a struggling economy, what employer, employee, retiree, student, child or home worker can afford to lose his health, productivity and land’s value for an energy source that doesn’t sound positive at all when you add up the negatives?

It sounds great for the company putting the millions in their pockets and to decision makers who have not researched this adequately for the citizens they represent. Count the real costs, while there is still time.

Karen Scott, of Bent Mountain, is a soil scientist and Bent Mountain Christian Academy administrator and teacher.

Source:  By Karen Scott, The Roanoke Times, www.roanoke.com 29 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.