LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

An ill wind threatens our freedoms 

Credit:  telegram.com 21 November 2010 ~~

The article “Wind resistance/Plans for turbines generate questions, opposition” (Telegram & Gazette, Nov. 17) illuminates the core protections afforded to citizens in communities determining if and where wind turbines will be sited, current zoning. A two-thirds town meeting vote is required for a zoning change.

Enter the wind bill. The intent of the bill is to shift the power of town meeting vote to an appointed panel that would make all wind turbine siting decisions. This bill constitutes the erosion of public and environmental protections now in place in communities that include setbacks, height restrictions and all local requirements.

The Nov. 15 Boston Business Journal reported that, according to state energy spokeswoman Lisa Capone, the wind bill would not allow the state to overrule local zoning rules. However, according to the wind bill, the wind energy permitting board created by the bill “has the authority to waive any local requirements needed to permit the facility, including, e.g., use limits and height limits in local zoning bylaws.”

The wind bill is a bad bill as it undermines citizens’ rights by design. It’s coauthored by a wind developer seeking unlimited, unmerited development potential and profits. By the wind bill, the public surrenders current zoning protections and the power of town meeting’s two-thirds vote to wind developers and their investors.

BARBARA DURKIN

Northboro

Source:  telegram.com 21 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon