East Leeds wind farm is blown out by plans inquiry
Credit: Yorkshire Evening Post, www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk 18 November 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Campaigners in east Leeds are celebrating after controversial wind farm proposals were thrown out by the Government’s Planning Inspectorate.
Durham-based company Banks Renewables appealed to the inspectorate after its application for the scheme on green belt land, pictured, at Hook Moor, near Micklefield was rejected by Leeds City Council in July last year.
Today, though, Banks confirmed that its appeal had failed, with the planning inspector who handled the case deciding it would cause harm to the green belt and its “visual amenities”.
The verdict was welcomed by the Hook Moor Wind Farm Action Group, which spearheaded opposition to the scheme.
Group spokeswoman Carolyn Walker said: “We’re delighted with the outcome – it bears out what we have been saying all along.”
Banks Renewables managing director Phil Dyke said the firm was “extremely disappointed” by the ruling.
The wind farm would have consisted of five propeller-style turbines, each reaching a height of 125 metres (410 feet).
Local residents argued that the site earmarked for the energy-producing scheme was too close to their homes.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 |
 |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=43820 ]
