[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Green Berkshires head: Wind energy shouldn’t be top priority  

Credit:  By David Pepose, New England Newspapers, www.thetranscript.com 30 October 2010 ~~

PITTSFIELD – The head of the Green Berkshires environmental advocacy group says wind turbines shouldn’t be at the forefront of the renewable energy portfolio in the county.

“We should think of wind turbines as the last thing, not the first thing,” Eleanor Tillinghast told an audience of more than 50 students and residents at a forum at Berkshire Community College on Tuesday.

Tillinghast is the executive director of Green Berkshires, an environmental research and advocacy nonprofit that encourages public awareness of the region’s environment and which “challenges large-scale threats to the region’s natural, scenic, and public resources.” Tillinghast and Green Berkshires unsuccessfully challenged the development of a $45 million wind farm in Florida.

Currently, there are three “wind farm” projects being developed in the Berkshires, including the 20-turbine project in Florida and Monroe, a 10-turbine project on Brodie Mountain and a 5-turbine project in Savoy. In addition, there are single turbines at Jiminy Peak and at the Williams Stone Company in Otis.

Over the course of her 45-minute discussion, Tillinghast discussed a host of reasons why she was against wind power in the Berkshires, saying that the amount of electricity generated in Western Massachusetts would be negligible even compared to nearby areas in New England such as Maine.

“You’re never going to be able to offset [coal] with an intermittent and unreliable source like wind,” Tillinghast said, adding that the students present would be paying for more expensive methods with their futures. “[We’re spending] $47 million that will be paying for less than 14/100ths of one percent of Massachusetts’ electricity.”

The real winners of wind energy, she said, were companies such as British Petroleum, Chevron, Shell and General Electric, who received millions in federal subsidies to develop wind facilities. But with countries like China paying workers just $4,100 a year to build turbines, “there are virtually no permanent jobs” created in Massachusetts by wind power, Tillinghast said.

Tillinghast also made mention of the economic and public safety hazards potentially posed by wind turbines. She said that not only would the scenery of Berkshire County be marred by turbines more than 400 feet tall, but that the noise pollution would significantly decrease property values for residents within two miles of the development.

“People think tourism stays – it’s as ephemeral as everything, you have to take care of it,” she said.

Quoting a September 2010 article from the Casper Journal in Wyoming, Tillinghast said that Natrona County state representative Mike Gilmore soon regretted having the turbines in his town.

“The jobs really didn’t materialize, and the taxes aren’t coming along either,” Gilmore said in the article. “We’ve devalued our own property.”

Finally, Tillinghast discussed the public safety implications of wind turbines, saying that malfunctioning turbines could send javelin-like chunks of ice – or even steel, in the event of a cataclysmic failure – flying at distances of up to a mile away.

Even under the best of working conditions, Tillinghast said that the turbines produced a grinding noise that affected residents up to 1.25 miles away. Citing a July 2010 article from Audiology Today, Tillinghast listed several health issues suffered by people living close to the turbines, including sleep deprivation, irritability and even vertigo.

Yet Tillinghast’s presentation did draw some critiques. “I think a lot of opinion was presented,” said Lenox Town Manager Gregory Federspiel, who attended the event. “I don’t know if everything that was stated could be backed up with facts.”

Federspiel said that for example, a recent test at Lenox Mountain showed that wind velocities could reach 8 meters per second. “That is in the excellent range according to her charts there,” he said.

“Certainly [Tuesday] we didn’t get balanced viewpoints,” Federspiel added. “We got a particular viewpoints, and she’s entitled to that viewpoint, but there are other viewpoints to be shared.”

Tyler Fairbanks, CEO of EOS Ventures, LLC, said that while he wasn’t at Tillinghast’s lecture, many of the concerns she presented varied from company to company. He said that working with General Electric, the “vast majority” of components were American-built, and that even many of the impermanent jobs lasted for years due to the length of development.

Other concerns, such as far-flung ice, were worked out by General Electric, while he said that noise complaints weren’t “statistically significant.”

“I think we can all find a reason ‘why not,’ ” Fairbanks said. “That’s hypothetical, but does good science show that these turbines are hazards? We’ve go to let good science carry the day.”

Tillinghast’s solution was instead of wind power, to intice reduction of energy use. She said that over a three-year period companies such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc. were saving as much electricity through internal practices than Massachusetts was through sweeping energy efficiency programs.

“We should be working with the companies to reduce their electrical use,” Tillinghast said. “It’s a smarter use of our public funds.”

Tillinghast helped found the Conservation Commission at Mount Washington, the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission, and the environmental stewardship initiative called Save the Housatonic.

Source:  By David Pepose, New England Newspapers, www.thetranscript.com 30 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.