Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Bethel zoners reject wind turbine plan
Credit: Kate Wilcox, Reading Eagle, readingeagle.com 21 October 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board voted 3-0 Wednesday night to deny a zoning variance for a wind turbine at a residence along Myer Drive.
Larry Levan had proposed building a 54-foot-tall wind turbine on his property to generate electricity for his home in the 100 block.
The zoning ordinance does not permit a structure taller than 35 feet in the agricultural preservation zoning district, which is where Levan’s house is located.
Levan said he needed the extra height so that the wind turbine would be above the trees surrounding his property.
“Electricity rates are supposed to go way up, and I’ve been wanting to do this for 30 years anyway,” he told the board. “I thought now is the time to do it.”
He has lived on the property for 35 years, he said.
A neighbor, Judy Apgar of Little Mountain Road, was also at the hearing to learn more about Levan’s plan.
“It doesn’t make any difference to me,” she said of the proposal.
Zoning board member C. Eugene Siegrist told Levan that an alternative energy ordinance dealing with wind turbines is currently being developed that would allow for turbines up to 45 feet high.
Levan told him that an extra 10 feet would still be needed to get above the trees on his property.
Levan did not say if he would appeal the decision, but that he would wait for the board’s letter of explanation, since the board members did not explain at the meeting why the variance wasn’t granted.
Also, the board voted to grant a variance for Richard Blatt of Lancaster Avenue to allow an automotive repair business on his property along Cabin Lane.
He needed a variance because the Cabin Lane property is in an agricultural preservation zoning district.
The variance was approved on the condition that he starts construction of a previously approved home in six months and that he is living on the property within 18 months.
Board members said Blatt will probably need to reapply for a building permit.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: