[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Construction work begins at Sheffield wind site  

Credit:  By Matt Sutkoski, Free Press Staff Writer, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 13 October 2010 ~~

Construction has started on a 16-turbine wind energy project in Sheffield, the first such project to be built in Vermont since the state’s only operating commercial wind farm was built in Searsburg 13 years ago.

Vermont Wind, a subsidiary of Boston-based First Wind, has begun clearing trees and building roads to the project site on Granby Mountain and Libby Hill.

First Wind spokesman John Lamontagne said he is not sure whether construction will start on the turbines this fall, or next spring. He said the company expects the wind farm to begin producing electricity next year.

According to the company’s website, the Sheffield project would produce 115,000 megawatt-hours of electricity per year, which the company says is enough to power all the homes in Caledonia County.

The start of construction generated both praise and disappointment, echoing the sparring that went on during the roughly six years the project was in the works. Once the turbines are installed in Sheffield, First Wind will pay the 700-person town $520,000 a year.

“My reaction is sad, disgust and anger,” said Rob Pforzheimer of Sutton, who said he lives about four miles from the wind farm. “I don’t think industrialization is suitable for the tops of mountains in Vermont.”

On the other side of debate is John Simons, 83, of Sheffield. “I’m delighted. We waited over six years,” he said.

Simons said he considers the wind farm safer than other forms of electrical generation, such as nuclear energy.

“Nuclear power scares me to death,” he said. “Someday, something in the nuclear line is going to go bang.”

Movement on wind turbine projects around Vermont has been glacial since the first facility was finished in 1997. Now, that’s started to change:

Ö In March, residents in Lowell voted to approve Green Mountain Power’s proposal for up to 24 wind turbines there.

Ö In June, developers of a three- to five-turbine commercial-scale wind project on the Georgia-Milton town line – the first project of its kind in Chittenden County – received a certificate of public good from the state Public Service Board.

Ö Additional turbines near the Searsburg site have won approval by the Public Service Board, but have not been built.

Wind farm opponents’ objections include the sight and sound of the turbines on the mountaintop.

Simons said as circumstances change, you can’t expect everything else to remain the same, and so it goes with the wind turbines on Granby Mountain.

“You can’t really say you’re changing Vermont because Vermont is going to change anyway,” Simons said.

Pforzheimer counters the changes coming to Sheffield are too great, especially for the environment. He says there are many wetlands in the area.

“Five streams and their tributaries feed into the Passumpsic and Willoughby rivers. There’s a habitat of hundreds of beech trees for bears,” he said.

Vermont Environmental Court Judge Merideth Wright ruled in late August that the wind energy project was entitled to the final permits it needed for construction. The construction started in late September.

Pforzheimer said opponents have asked Wright to reconsider the decision, and are considering appealing to the Vermont Supreme Court.

Lamontagne said he could not speculate on what effects future court challenges, if they develop, would have on construction.

He said once the land was cleared and roads were built to the site, turbine parts would be brought to the site and assembled. After the turbines are tested to ensure they work properly, the wind farm would be brought online to add power to the electrical grid, he said.

Source:  By Matt Sutkoski, Free Press Staff Writer, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 13 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.