[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lack of turbine info criticised 

Credit:  By MARTY SHARPE - The Dominion Post, www.stuff.co.nz 8 October 2010 ~~

Contact Energy has provided the Environment Court with a woeful amount of information on its proposed Waitahora Wind Farm near Dannevirke, an opponent of the development says.

The Environment Court in Hastings is considering an appeal by Contact against a decision by three commissioners to decline permission for the 65-turbine wind farm on the Puketoi range, about 10 kilometres northwest of Dannevirke.

Contact scaled the proposal back, proposing instead to install 58 turbines up to 125 metres high, or 52 turbines 150m high, capable of powering 70,000 homes. It is seeking a 10-year timeframe for the $400 million project.

A lawyer for the Waitahora-Puketoi Guardian Society, Matthew McClelland, told the court the wind farm would have major effects, including potential contamination of water to neighbouring properties, inappropriate effects on an outstanding natural landscape and irreparable effects on sites of ecologic and scientific importance.

Mr McClelland said Contact’s “skeletal” environmental assessment still lacked sufficient information, despite this being a major reason for the commissioners declining the application last year.

Among the society’s concerns were that:

Only seven of the 52 turbine sites had been investigated.

Only 20 bores had been dug to provide an indication of a site of 419ha.

The siting of the turbines was still speculative.

No geotechnical investigations had been done on the effect of turbines on this type of limestone.

Contact’s claim that detailed design work would start once consents were obtained was contrary to the requirement of the Resource Management Act and required the court to “take a leap of faith and trust that the applicant would do things properly once the consent is granted”, Mr McClelland said.

Opponents “had no faith this will occur”, he said.

They were also concerned at Contact’s “deliberate and intentional failure” to apply for transmission consents at the same time they applied for the wind farm.

The effects of transmission lines and supports were likely to be significant as they covered 50km and crossed many properties, he said.

Source:  By MARTY SHARPE - The Dominion Post, www.stuff.co.nz 8 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky