[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Fort Drum wary of wind near Wheeler-Sack Airfield 

Credit:  By Nancy Madsen, Times Staff Writer, Watertown Daily Times, www.watertowndailytimes.com 7 October 2010 ~~

FORT DRUM – Wind power developers looking at Jefferson County don’t have a set distance to avoid the Army installation.

“It would be something we would look at on a case-by-case basis,” Fort Drum spokeswoman Julie A. Cupernall said.

About a month ago, the New York Times published a story detailing the delays or abandonment of 9,000 megawatts of proposed wind projects in the country because of concerns of radar interference raised by the military or the Federal Aviation Administration. Turbines can look like airplanes on radar or cause blackout zones where planes disappear, the article said.

Possible aircraft approach and radar interference led officials at the Army installation to warn the Indian River Central School District that it may not be allowed to have a 350-foot turbine off Route 11. The post gave the district a strobe light to put on the top of the 164-foot meteorological tower used to test wind speed.

“The prospect of a large wind turbine in the general vicinity of the Indian River High School does cause concern for our operations, most notably through potentially significant adverse impacts to both approach procedures and radar coverage at Wheeler-Sack Army Airfield,” Ms. Cupernall said in an e-mail. “That being said, Fort Drum does not wish to prevent anyone, Indian River High School included, from exploring the use of alternative energy resources, as we recognize their importance and are, in fact, currently utilizing solar power in our efforts to maximize sustainability.”

Decision-makers on post don’t have any policies or rules for tower setbacks. And, Ms. Cupernall said, the FAA would decide whether towers are far enough away from Wheeler-Sack Army Airfield.

A spokesman for the FAA said it also doesn’t have set rules on distances from airports. Any builder must file a notice with the FAA for any structure over 201 feet tall.

“During the evaluation, civilian and military radar issues are always examined,” FAA spokesman Jim Peters wrote in an e-mail. “Before filing an application, FAA does not tell a proponent what heights they can obtain for a turbine.”

Instead, each of the eight air traffic divisions considers the filing, then an obstruction evaluation specialist considers the obstruction standards and checks the visual flight rules traffic pattern for the airport, he said.

So far, industrial-scale developers have avoided the area near Fort Drum. The nearest proposed project would be the Horse Creek Wind Farm in Clayton and Orleans, but that project does not now have an active application.

Developer Iberdrola Renewables said Fort Drum may not have been specifically considered, but airfield setbacks are “a pretty common constraint.”

Communications Manager Paul N. Copleman said in an e-mail that the developer studies turbine and airfield locations “as well as the flight paths in and out, which can make for setbacks much larger than three miles.”

Projects planned for farther away don’t necessarily look at Fort Drum.

“We didn’t consider it in the siting,” said James H. Madden, project manager for Cape Vincent Wind Farm, miles from the Army post. “To date, we’re not aware of any issues.”

Source:  By Nancy Madsen, Times Staff Writer, Watertown Daily Times, www.watertowndailytimes.com 7 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon