[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

First Wind ‘still interested’  

Credit:  By Kim Ring TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF, www.telegram.com 1 October 2010 ~~

BRIMFIELD – While opponents of a proposed wind farm atop West Mountain were claiming victory when selectmen decided Wednesday night not to take $30,000 from First Wind, a company spokesman said First Wind has not backed away from the project.

John R. LaMontagne said the company is still looking at the site near Steerage Rock.

“We’re still evaluating what our next steps are,” Mr. LaMontagne, director of corporate communications for First Wind, said last night. “We’re still interested in Brimfield.”

The group has a tower at the site that is collecting data on wind speed and weather to determine if placing eight to 10 400-foot turbines would be feasible.

Members of No Brimfield Wind, a vocal ad hoc group opposed to the project, spoke out during the selectmen’s meeting Wednesday. Board members were deciding whether to accept $30,000 from the company to fund local studies of the project.

Some residents said they would rather pay for the studies themselves than take the funding from First Wind. Selectmen, and Mr. LaMontagne, said there would be no strings attached to the money, but opponents said they did not feel comfortable with that deal.

Mr. LaMontagne said representatives from the company heard the concerns, though it is too early to tell if some of the issues will be factors at the Brimfield site.

Unless a new law handing oversight of such projects to the state is passed, First Wind would need town meeting approval for a zoning change to build the towers.

Residents who spoke out Wednesday said they would also work to defeat changes to local bylaws that would clear the way for the project.

Source:  By Kim Ring TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF, www.telegram.com 1 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.