[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Hill Country power line seen as only option  

Credit:  By Tracy Idell Hamilton - Express-News, www.mysanantonio.com 29 September 2010 ~~

There is no cost-effective alternative to building a transmission line through the Hill Country, according to the state’s electrical grid operator.

The proposed line would bring West Texas wind power to the state’s most populous cities and is being fought by Hill Country landowners, who say the clear-cutting and massive lattice towers that would carry the wires would decimate the most beautiful and ecologically sensitive land left in Texas.

The letter filed Monday by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which operates the grid, to the Public Utility Commission of Texas stated “no effective alternatives” to the roughly 130-mile Schleicher County-to-Kendall County line had been identified. The study also found an existing private line is not a viable substitute.

A proposed segment from Kendall to Gillespie, however, could be done less expensively by upgrading the Kendall substation, ERCOT reported.

That small piece of good news was cold comfort for opponents of the entire project.

“This is the last nail in the coffin to place a more sensitive approach to bring this wind energy from west to east,” said Bill Neiman, a farmer and president of the Clear View Alliance, a group formed to fight the transmission lines.

The proposed $367 million line connecting Schleicher, Kendall and Gillespie counties is the most controversial part of a statewide, $5 billion transmission-line expansion mandated by the Legislature to aid the development of wind power.

Congestion is so great on existing lines that turbines sometimes are forced to shut down on the windiest days.

The Legislature in 2007 ordered the lines be built, but when the Lower Colorado River Authority’s transmission arm filed to build lines in its territory, grass-roots groups and government entities across the Hill Country protested.

In August, PUC Chairman Barry Smitherman asked ERCOT to reassess whether the Hill Country line was necessary.

Earlier, Sen. Troy Fraser, R-Horseshoe Falls, had asked that the need for a new line between Gillespie and Lampasas counties be re-evaluated, and ERCOT’s analysis reported that upgrading existing lines could be done instead.

ERCOT’s about-face on that segment, along Smitherman’s request, prompted calls to scrap the entire case before the PUC, and that a full re-evaluation be done.

Neiman said the opposition still was recovering from the shock it got Sept. 15, when the PUC chose not to do so.

“Politicians, landowners, even the PUC’s own attorneys recommended dismissing the case,” Neiman said.

Since then, groups in the case have been scrambling to file final testimony, which was due Tuesday. The case will be heard in late October.

Source:  By Tracy Idell Hamilton - Express-News, www.mysanantonio.com 29 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.