[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

$66M to scrap turbines  

Credit:  By Jay Fitzgerald, Boston Herald, bostonherald.com 17 September 2010 ~~

Bay State ratepayers and taxpayers – already footing the $2 billion-plus bill to plant 130 Cape Wind turbines in Nantucket Sound – will have to cough up an additional $66 million to dismantle the structures when they eventually break down, newly revealed state filings show.

The controversial project, strongly back by Gov. Deval Patrick and inching ever closer to final government approval, will probably last only about 25 years before they need to be torn down.

“This is the granddaddy of all sweetheart deals, and now they’re adding insult to injury for Massachusetts ratepayers, who already pay among the highest electric costs in the country,” said Rick Gorka, spokesman for GOP gubernatorial candidate Charlie Baker, who’s trying to unseat Patrick.

“No matter how Governor Patrick tries to spin this, the ratepayers and taxpayers of Massachusetts are on the hook for this $2 billion project and now could be stuck with the $66 million price tag to tear it down,” Gorka said.

Developer Cape Wind Associates estimates that final dismantling of the turbine relics will cost $66 million in today’s dollars in a filing with the state Department of Public Utilities newly made public. The figure is sure to rise due to inflation over the quarter-century life of the nation’s first off-shore wind farm.

Treasurer Tim Cahill, an independent candidate for governor, also blasted the growing price tag.

“It seems like every day more hidden costs come to light,” Cahill said in a statement. “Cape Wind and the costs associated with it will be a burden to the taxpayers of Massachusetts for years to come just like the Big Dig.”

Cape Wind has emerged as a major issue in this year’s hotly contested governor’s race, and Patrick’s camp hit back fast and hard yesterday.

“The governor strongly supports Cape Wind, both for the clean energy it will provide and the jobs and related industries that will be created by Massachusetts having the first offshore wind-farm in the nation,” Patrick’s campaign said in a statement.

“Charlie Baker and Tim Cahill oppose Cape Wind, and would jeopardize the progress we have made in creating new jobs and supporting clean-energy related businesses in Massachusetts.”

A Cape Wind spokesman insists the “decommissioning” expense will come out of the developer’s pockets.

“The federal government is going to require that Cape Wind pay the cost to decommission the project at the end of its useful life,” said spokesman Mark Rodgers.

But critics counter that Cape Wind’s revenues ultimately come from ratepayers and taxpayers putting money in the developer’s pocket through monthly electric bills and federal subsidies.

In the DPU filings, Cape Wind’s developer said the federal government will require more detailed decommissioning plans once the turbines are up and running.

Cape Wind also will have to “provide financial assurances” to the U.S. Minerals Management Service that it can pay for removing the turbines, according to the new filings.

“Decommissioning the project is largely the reverse of the installation process,” Cape Wind said. “Utilizing the same or similar types of cranes and vessels as during their construction, the blades, rotor, nacelles (engine covers) and tower would be sequentially disassembled and removed to port for recycling.”

Source:  By Jay Fitzgerald, Boston Herald, bostonherald.com 17 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.