[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Biz group takes AIM at Cape Wind; Says power deal skirts state rules  

Credit:  By Jay Fitzgerald, Boston Herald General Economics Reporter, bostonherald.com ~~

A major business group tangled with National Grid executives yesterday over whether a Cape Wind contract complies with state bidding rules and whether proposed electric rates are being fairly applied to customers.

On the fourth day of hearings on a proposed $2.7 billion contract between National Grid and the Cape Wind developer, a lawyer for the Associated Industries of Massachusetts zeroed in on how the utility and offshore wind farm builder arrived at a long-term electric contract earlier this year.

Bob Rio, a senior vice president at AIM, suggested that National Grid veered away from a state law requiring “cost-effective and reasonable” rates after seeking competitive bids from renewable energy suppliers.

Lawyers for AIM also suggested that the expensive Cape Wind rates – which are more than twice as high as electricity from fossil-fuel power plants – are unfairly being applied to National Grid customers who technically buy their power from other energy suppliers. Such customers usually only pay National Grid distribution fees, Rio said.

But Richard Rapp, a National Grid executive who headed up contract talks with Cape Wind, said the utility has closely followed contract guidelines as outlined by the state’s Green Communities Act.

The Department of Public Utilities’ hearings on the controversial Cape Wind project are expected to run through next week.

Source:  By Jay Fitzgerald, Boston Herald General Economics Reporter, bostonherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.