| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Of rights and wind
Credit: By Boston Herald Editorial Staff, www.bostonherald.com 1 September 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
There is enormous wisdom coming out of the Supreme Judicial Court in yesterday’s Cape Wind ruling.
Sad to say that wisdom was found in the dissenting opinion offered by Chief Justice Margaret Marshall and will, therefore, be little more than a footnote in the long and tortured history of this project.
Project opponents had challenged a decision of the state Energy Facilities Siting Board that granted the project permission to run power transmission lines through state waters – permission essential to the future of the project. Cape Wind appealed to the state board after the Cape Cod Commission had rejected its proposal.
“It is not our role,” Marshall wrote, “to evaluate whether as a matter of sound policy the project should be constructed. Rather, we must determine whether the approval process of the Cape Wind project comports with the laws of the Commonwealth. It does not.”
In fact, she added, the court’s majority “establishes a dangerous and unwise precedent, which has far-reaching consequences. A wind farm today may be a drilling rig or nuclear power plant tomorrow.”
There are lots of reasons to oppose this project, including the increased costs to ratepayers in the years ahead.
But yesterday’s SJC decision points to yet another. In its efforts to ensure the future of this particular project the Patrick administration has run roughshod over the centuries-old public trust doctrine.
As the chief justice noted, “The stakes are high. As we have recently seen in the Gulf of Mexico, the failure to take into account in-state consequences of federally authorized energy projects in federal waters can have catastrophic effects on state tidelands and coastal areas, and on all who depend on them.”
There will be little satisfaction for the chief justice or anyone else in the years ahead to say “we told you so.” But this erosion of rights long held by the people of this commonwealth is now part of the lasting legacy of Cape Wind.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=41567 ]
