LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cape Wind foes want Grid contracts axed 

Credit:  By State House News Service. bostonherald.com 28 August 2010 ~~

Cape Wind opponents are urging state regulators to dismiss contracts between the offshore wind power developers and National Grid, citing the state’s recent rejection of three contracts filed by Nstar.

An Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound motion with the Department of Public Utilities, announced yesterday, claims the state failed to engage in an open solicitation process to consider out-of-state renewable energy alternatives required under the department’s new emergency regulations.

Project officials ripped the motion as a delay tactic.

The alliance cited failure to comply with that regulation, based on a provision of the state’s Green Communities Act, as the reason behind the department’s rejection on Aug. 13 of the Nstar contracts.

“There is no basis for treating the contracts differently. In fact, it sends the message that a utility which uses a competitive bidding process to find the best deal for Massachusetts ratepayers is held to a higher standard than a utility that picks a high-priced, no-bid deal,” Audra Parker, CEO of the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, said in a statement.

During a recent gubernatorial debate, Cape Wind opponents Tim Cahill and Charles Baker opposed the project, describing it as a boon for the developers and likely to push electric rates higher.

Gov. Deval Patrick, a project supporter, said during the debate that the project had not been given preferential treatment, had been extensively vetted and “has been treated like every other generation project that has come before the commonwealth in the last 15 years.”

Cape Wind spokesman Mark Rodgers said, “This is yet another in a long series of attempts by this coal- and oil-funded opposition group to try to delay Cape Wind’s benefits of hundreds of new jobs, greater energy independence and cleaner air to the people of Massachusetts.

“The fact is that we followed the procedures laid out in the Green Communities Act and that the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities approved our negotiations with National Grid.”

Source:  By State House News Service. bostonherald.com 28 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky