Erosion violations halt Garrett County wind project
Credit: By Timothy B. Wheeler, The Baltimore Sun, www.baltimoresun.com 26 August 2010 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
State environmental officials have halted construction on Maryland’s second industrial wind project after finding “numerous” erosion-control violations on the remote Garrett County mountain ridge where an Annapolis-based developer is putting up 20 turbines.
The Maryland Department of the Environment ordered Synergics Wind Energy and its contractor, White Construction, to stop work until they fix all the shortcomings in their measures to prevent mud from washing off the building site into nearby streams. The work shutdown, ordered Wednesday, comes a little more than three weeks after state inspectors first visited the site in response to a complaint from a nearby resident.
“They had four miles of mountaintop completely torn up and had minimal – I mean minimal – controls,” said Eric Robison, a contractor who lives on a different stretch of Backbone Mountain near Oakland. He said he contacted the state in late July after taking hundreds of photographs to document conditions at the construction site. “I was amazed at what they were doing.”
MDE spokesman Jay Apperson said inspectors found problems throughout the project, including missing and inadequate “silt fences” to filter sediment out of storm runoff whenever it rains. The state officials advised the companies Aug. 3 to stop grading and excavating until the controls were in place, and both agreed to do so. The contractor was allowed to continue other construction work, such as pouring concrete.
Sign up for Entertainment text alerts and you could win 4 tickets to see Justin Bieber at the Md. State Fair
Follow-up inspections on Aug. 9 and 17 found the companies had not completed all the erosion controls, the MDE spokesman said in an e-mail. When inspectors returned again Tuesday, they found the remedies still not complete, Apperson said, but they also found that more ground had been excavated for turbines – contrary to what the companies had agreed to. So inspectors advised a full shutdown of all construction work, and followed up with an official order the next day.
Frank Maisano, a spokesman for Synergics, noted the complaint came from opponents to the two wind projects being built on Backbone Mountain, and that “there have been no negative environmental impacts” from the faulty erosion controls. Even so, he added in an e-mail, “We expect the contractor will resolve the state’s issues and continue construction very soon.”
It was the second stumble for the state’s first two industrial wind projects, which have proved controversial because of the visual and potential wildlife impacts of putting towering turbines atop wooded mountain ridges. Constellation Energy got off to a similarly rough start in the spring when it began building its 28-turbine project on a different stretch of Backbone Mountain. The state shut work down there for more than a week after incomplete erosion controls allowed mud to wash into a tributary of one of the state’s wild and scenic rivers.
The Baltimore-based company was fined $12,670, and this summer began raising the 415-foot high turbines on the mountaintop. Apperson said the state is still investigating the other project’s erosion violations and so could not say how much, or whether, any penalties would be assessed.
Opponents have threatened to file suit to block both projects, contending the turbines will hurt or kill rare bats that are protected under the federal Endangered Species Act. Three residents also have petitioned Garrett County Circuit Court contending that county officials are not enforcing the local storm-water pollution ordinance at the wind projects.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
|Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding