LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine plan a waste of money 

Credit:  by Nick Moncrieff-Hill, Southern Courier, southern-courier.whereilive.com.au 24 August 2010 ~~

A proposal to build a wind turbine in Arthur Byrne Reserve, Maroubra, has been panned by residents who have labelled the green initiative an absurd stunt and a waste of ratepayer money.

The development application for the 14m pole with a rotary blade about 4m in diameter was submitted by Randwick Council to its own planning department earlier this month.

The device will cost $40,000 and is expected to produce energy that will be returned to the nearby power grid. The initiative is intended to encourage residents to embrace alternative energy sources.

“It will supplement the current grid minimally but it will also provide a demonstration of the use of alternative energy within Randwick City Council, as part of the council’s commitment to environmental sustainability,” a report attached to the development application stated.

However, some residents said not only would the turbine be unsuitable for private residential use, but it would kill native birds, create noise pollution and obstruct views.

Wind farm developer Steve Jackson, a Maroubra resident, said the turbine was overpriced and would generate only enough energy to power one home for three months, or “about what a street light needs”.

“Council seems to be trying to promote a technology that no Randwick City residents will be able to replicate and it costs about 10 times the cost of a sensible alternative,” Mr Jackson said.

“Council would, in my view, gain far more benefit from an educational program or from demonstrating technologies that are actually able to be utilised within the City of Randwick.”

Mr Jackson said he would appeal in the Land and Environment Court any decision to install the turbine and asked Randwick councillors to debate the application at their next monthly meeting.

Source:  by Nick Moncrieff-Hill, Southern Courier, southern-courier.whereilive.com.au 24 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky