LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Noise concerns slow Ocean City wind turbine plan 

Credit:  By Brian Shane, Staff Writer, The Daily Times, www.delmarvanow.com 19 August 2010 ~~

OCEAN CITY – A neighbor’s concerns over noise have put plans for Ocean City’s first backyard wind turbine on hold, as town officials await more information on just how loud the spinning blades will be.

Ocean City’s Planning and Zoning Commission decided to keep open a public hearing and reconvene within 60 days to conclude whether applicant Jim Motsko may proceed.

Resort officials passed a law in 2009 allowing residential wind turbines. Property owners can install roof- or pole-mounted wind turbines, as long as they meet noise and height restrictions, among other regulations. If approved, Motsko’s turbine would be the first.

“Because it’s the first time trying our new ordinance, you know, we want to get this right,” said Pam Buckley, commission chair. “We don’t want to have Jim here putting this thing in, and then we get so much noise and grief from it that he ends up having to pull it down or turn it off.”

Motsko has planned for two years to install a 39-foot-tall pole-mounted wind turbine at his Sixth Street bayfront home. With the 6-foot-wide fan blades, the tower height comes to 45 feet. It would be the first-ever residential power turbine for the resort.

At the hearing, Motsko faced opposition from his next-door neighbor, Robert Kenney.

Kenney said while he appreciates the environmental aspects of the project, he worries the turbine will be too loud, lower his property value and spoil his bayfront views.

“It’s one of the few places left in town that you can actually go hear, at any time, the lapping of the water on the rocks and the environment around you,” said Kenney, one of five unit owners of the adjacent Islander condominium building. “We would be devastated if that were no longer the case.”

“This is ground-breaking times,” he added, alluding to the novelty of the turbine. “But it’s also tough times – property values, everything else. There’s more than just the aesthetics of dealing with it. You’re going to impact a way of life on that property for the future.”

Kenney said he believes the spinning fan blades could produce noise as loud as a vacuum cleaner, which is calculated roughly at 70 decibels. A whisper-quiet library is measured at 30 db, regular conversation is 55-60 db, a lawnmower is 90 db and a jet engine is 140 db.

Stacey Hart, the engineer for the project, testified it would be very unlikely the fan would produce sound any louder than 40 decibels. Ocean City’s wind turbine law limits fan blades to 55 db.

It’s not just town officials who have to sign off on the plans. Because the turbine would be built 10 feet from the Isle of Wight Bay – a state-owned waterway – the Maryland Department of the Environment must grant permission.

However, the state won’t allow easements of wind turbines unless the applicant is a public utility. While the details are still being worked out, any such easement may instead come in the form of a “no-license permit,” said Joseph Moore, Motsko’s attorney.

Moore said he believes Motsko’s application meets all the requirements for a conditional use of a wind turbine, and that stringent specifications would have to be proven to deny any such permit. He said there wasn’t enough evidence presented by opponents to deny the permit.

Source:  By Brian Shane, Staff Writer, The Daily Times, www.delmarvanow.com 19 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky