[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Steens Mountain wind turbines are wake-up call to Oregonians  

Credit:  By RUSSELL HOEFLICH and JUDI JOHANSEN, www.oregonlive.com 21 February 2011 ~~

News that multiple wind farms are planned on the north flank of Steens Mountain should be a wake-up call to Oregonians. Flocks of wind turbines on such an iconic landmark are more than a cloud on the horizon. They’re an approaching storm.

We couldn’t believe more strongly in the need to expand renewable power, including wind energy. We are proud of Oregon’s leadership in green technology. We also understand that new energy facilities will leave an unavoidable footprint wherever they’re situated.

But if industrial-scale energy plants – whether wind, wave, solar or geothermal – start going up in what are demonstrably the wrong places, our clean energy future and Oregon’s green industry are doomed.

If we allow important places and sensitive habitats to be scarred and disrupted by new roads, turbines and transmission lines, then the renewables industry will be tainted, public support for renewable power will dwindle and potential investors will disappear.

Steens Mountain makes the point. This stunning landscape, treasured by generations, is a haven for amazing wildlife including sage-grouse, golden eagles and bighorn sheep. Local landowners and taxpayers have invested tremendous effort and millions of dollars to protect the pristine natural character of the Steens.

Today, Steens Mountain is at risk because Oregon has no plan or process to point renewable energy developments to better places with fewer impacts.

Instead, developers essentially have free rein to pursue projects wherever they can find a willing landowner. They can break apart big projects into pieces small enough to avoid state-level review. No significant ecological assessment, consideration of alternatives or study of environmental or cumulative effects is required.

The only hurdle remains county approval. It is understandable when cash-strapped Oregon counties, desperate for jobs, embrace these proposals. But they’re the ones hurt the most when an ill-considered project runs into problems or costly delays and never gets built.

There has to be a better way. A more enlightened approach to locating new energy facilities can offer greater certainty to developers, power purchasers and local communities. It can ensure strong protection for Oregon’s extraordinary natural heritage and create jobs in rural communities geared to the careful stewardship of natural resources.

Oregonians need and deserve a new energy road map that encourages responsible development in the most suitable places. It must begin with a comprehensive assessment of our renewable resource opportunities and their intersection with ecological values. It must address policies and incentives for siting new facilities.

The 2011 Legislature and our next governor should be prepared next January to bring Oregon’s renewable energy planning into the 21st century. They’ll find willing partners in the energy industry and the conservation community eager to work side by side with them to keep Oregon’s energy future on a truly green path.

Advancing renewable energy and protecting our environment are not conflicting goals. The fact is, in today’s world, we simply cannot achieve one without the other.

Russell Hoeflich is Oregon director of The Nature Conservancy and co-chairman of the Natural Resources Committee of the Oregon Global Warming Commission. Judi Johansen is president of Marylhurst University, former CEO of PacifiCorp and former administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration.

Source:  By RUSSELL HOEFLICH and JUDI JOHANSEN, www.oregonlive.com 21 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.