[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Name and shame on wind farms 

In his letter to the Gazette (July 16), Mr Stan Dibble, says two North Devon Council councillors told him the barrister for the judicial review of the Fullabrook Windfarm planning application was “confident”. Perhaps Mr Dibble would like to name those councillors.

The decision by North Devon Council to refuse the application was a legal decision. There were no planning reasons to overturn the officers’ recommendation of refusal. Thus the decision was in accordance with the Planning Act of the 1990 Conservative Government. The applicant, under the same Act, had the right of appeal and did so. The planning inspector overturned the NDC refusal. This was a legitimate action under the 1990 Act, as NDC’s legal department was well aware. The only way to challenge this decision was by way of judicial review. The legal department and the councillors should also have been aware that the chance of a judicial review being successful was very slim indeed. The council itself had defended judicial reviews over the years and I cannot think of one that has succeeded in overturning a legitimate decision. Of course, even if it had been successful then the council might have been forced to pay compensation to the developer.

There can be no doubt that on shore windfarms change the look of the countryside but even more worrying is the fact that when the the windfarms are gone, the land will be classed as “industrial” and thus open to virtually any development.

So, come on Stan, “name and shame”.

Roy Morrish,


North Devon Gazette

23 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky