[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farms must meet targets  

Your reporting of the Government’s energy policy focuses on the supply problems that make the building of 7,000 wind turbines onshore and offshore by 2020 infeasible (News & Christopher Booker, June 29). But there is worse hidden in the 267-page consultation document.

It largely swallows the industry’s complaint that planning delays for wind energy developments are the root cause of problems in the UK. In fact peer-reviewed literature concludes that planning conditions are similar in Germany, slightly more risky in Denmark, and significantly longer in Spain.

However, in two short paragraphs, the document admits that supply chain constraints could have a significant impact, especially for wind energy. It admits that supplies of blades for turbines take up to three years to be delivered and it understates turbine delivery delays at only 18 months.

It is not until page 228 that the document says: “We will also need to consider the potential environmental impacts such as those on biodiversity, landscapes, air quality, soils and land as well as the marine environment.” So much for our landscapes and historical assets.

Why does the document not state unequivocally that for most of England average wind speeds are insufficient for onshore wind energy? In one stroke most of our landscapes and historic assets would be protected, much of the opposition quelled and there would be a chance to place turbines where they will do the most good.

We could also get on with maximising electricity generation and carbon emissions avoidance where it would be most effective. This (if they would only admit it) would be in the best interests of the Government, as well as consumers of electricity.

(Prof) Michael Jefferson, Melchbourne, Bedfordshire

Telegraph

6 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter