[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind surge poses a risk to salmon and reveals flaws in BPA’s power-regulating system  

Columbia Basin river managers had a close call this week when they were forced to cut back on hydropower after a surge in wind energy blasted through the system.

The surge forced them to spill more water over dams, risking the health of migrating fish. For the first time, it also exposed serious kinks in a plan that was supposed to deal smoothly with just such emergencies.

As it turned out, the spills weren’t heavy enough to harm fish. But the federal Bonneville Power Administration admitted that confusion and missteps by the agency and wind-farm operators marred proper handling of the situation.

“It was a wake-up call,” said Brian Silverstein, a BPA transmission vice president.

Wind energy has grown dramatically in the Columbia River Gorge the past several years. Though touted as a clean and renewable resource, it also has increased stress on the hydropower system, which is used to balance wind’s variability.

Problems began Monday afternoon when wind speeds jumped far beyond levels forecast by wind-farm operators. BPA, responsible for adjusting hydro generation to accommodate the wind, realized by evening that it could no longer handle the sustained surge without increasing spills to dangerous levels

Generally, spills are needed to help juvenile salmon make their way downriver. But too much water can prove lethal.

Following guidelines, BPA power managers began calling wind-farm operators about 7 p.m. with orders to dump the excess wind. It was the first time the agency has made such requests.

Calls to several wind-farm managers reached only answering machines, though dispatchers are supposed to be available around the clock. A dispatcher at another wind farm answered and reduced its generation. BPA declined to disclose the company’s name.

Another, Iberdrola Renewables (formerly PPM Energy), misinterpreted the request and kept the turbines turning. “It was a miscommunication,” said Don Furman, a senior vice president with Iberdrola. “Basically, we had the wrong people talking to each other.”

BPA’s Silverstein said his agency “could have been more clear in what we asked them to do.”

That evening marked the first time BPA has had to order wind operators to dump generation. But as more wind projects are developed, it won’t be the last, BPA said.

The agency can sanction wind companies that disobey pull-back orders. In this case, penalties were unnecessary, Silverstein said, but a serious fine-tuning of protocols definitely is.

Gail Kinsey Hill

The Oregonian Staff


5 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.