[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm developer submits agreement to Enfield Town Board  

A developer’s agreement was submitted to the Enfield Town Board Wednesday that, if passed, would pledge the town’s support for John Rancich’s proposed wind farm and allow him to move ahead with purchasing agreements.

Town Supervisor Frank Podufalski put off any action by the town board until he has received counsel from the town attorney, Guy Krogh.

The town planning board is continuing to draft a law to govern the wind farm in place of the wind law that was repealed in March by the town board that took office in January. If the agreement passes, Rancich would be able to receive his wind turbines on schedule in the Fall of 2009. If the agreement is not accepted and Rancich is unable to obtain the turbines next Fall, he may have to wait up to four years for another chance to purchase turbines, Rancich’s associate Steve Bauman said.

The setbacks, which have been a point of contention throughout Rancich’s attempt to get town board approval, are less than half the distance they were in the developer’s agreement than in the old law. In the old law the setbacks were 1250 feet, which effectively killed the project, Rancich said after the first law was passed.

The agreement would not be law, but if it does garner the board’s support, that would be the agreement Rancich would function under until another law is passed.

Podufalski said the town planning board is getting much closer at coming up with a new law based on a law in place in Cohocton. He said he expects to have a law in place by the end of the year.

Rancich said he has one resident on Black Oak Road (the wind farm’s proposed setting) who has not yet agreed to allow a wind farm on or near their property.

The developer’s agreement was “patterned after the old law,” Rancich said, and board member Stephanie Gaynor said she thought the draft was well put together.

Sandy Small, a former town board member that voted for the old law, commended Podufalski on waiting to get more information on the agreement before calling for a vote.

Podufalski said he would provide Rancich with details of any changes town attorney Krogh has for the agreement before the July meeting so Rancich will have a chance to resubmit the document.

By Tim Ashmore
Journal Staff

The Ithaca Journal

12 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.