[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Opponents of Fairhaven wind project take their fight to court  

FAIRHAVEN – In a civil suit filed against the town last week, a group of 11 residents is asking the court to overturn the Planning Board’s approval of a two-turbine wind project.

“These turbines are going to be placed unreasonably close to these residences, to these homes,” said Ann DeNardis, who is representing the plaintiffs. “It is an unreasonable burden that these plaintiffs are being asked to bear for the benefit of the entire community – and the benefit of an individual developer in particular.”

Developer CCI Energy is proposing to erect two 397-foot wind turbines on town-owned land adjacent to the waste treatment plant on Arsene Street.

The complaint, filed June 4 in Bristol County Superior Court, alleges the proposed wind turbines will “detract from the character of the neighborhood, including the scenic, historic and historical values of the neighborhood,” thus decreasing the plaintiffs’ property values.

Planning Board members were “improperly biased” in CCI Energy’s favor, the complaint alleged, a “taint of bias” that violated the abutters and other public hearing participants’ due process rights.

The complaint also detailed concerns about noise levels, the effect the project might have on the town’s bike path and the adequacy of the town’s setback bylaw.

Ms. DeNardis, on behalf of a similar group of residents, also filed an appeal of the Conservation Commission’s order of conditions with the state Department of Environmental Protection.

The department conducted a site review May 29 but has not issued a decision yet.

Developer James Sweeney, president of CCI Energy, said residents have every right to appeal decisions.

“Yet I don’t believe there’s anything valid in what they’re arguing for other than my belief that it’s a delay tactic,” he said.

The project’s investors are committed to moving forward with the project despite the delays, according to Mr. Sweeney.

However, the delays may force a switch to turbines about 66 feet taller than the ones currently proposed in order to make up the financial losses associated with the delay, he said.

CCI Energy is evaluating its legal options before deciding how to proceed, according to Mr. Sweeney.

By Charis Anderson
Standard-Times staff writer


10 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.