LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Member states in push to revise renewables plans 

Germany, the UK and Poland are proposing new flexibility mechanisms to help reach EU renewable energy targets, while Italy is demanding a new method be used to calculate countries’ renewables potential. Rome is also pushing for a reduction of the EU’s 10% biofuels target.

“The current [renewables] package may not deliver the best value for money,” say Germany, the UK and Poland in a joint statement released during the Energy Council of 6 June. The Commission is basing the targets on economic strength rather than on the basis of countries’ potential “to deliver cost-efficient renewables,” the statement continues.

While the three member states are not calling for a new method to calculate their individual renewable energy targets, they are nonetheless demanding more ‘flexibility’.

Included in their proposal is a mechanism that would allow EU countries to collaborate towards achieving their individual goals via joint projects. Two member states could also combine their targets, and countries that reach their targets early should be able to transfer surplus renewable energy to states that are falling behind, according to the statement.

Significantly, the three member states’ proposals do not include any mention of trading in renewable energy certificates. According to Oliver Schäfer, policy director at the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), the UK’s support for the plans signals an important shift in London’s policy orientation on the matter.

The Commission’s proposal on renewable certificates trading “is not flying anymore”, he said. France and Spain are also likely to support non-trading flexibility mechanisms, Schäfer said.

This apparent policy shift is also in line with some of the flexibility mechanisms outlined in MEP Claude Turmes’ report on renewables, presented to fellow MEPs in late May (EurActiv 28/05/08).

Number crunching

Italy, meanwhile, is calling for a revision of the criteria used to calculate national targets, which are currently based national GDP. Rome wants to add an emissions criterion to the calculation method, whereby states that pollute less would also have lower targets.

“We will suggest introducing the criterion of pro-capita emissions alongside the one related to GDP to reconcile national objectives on renewables,” Italian Economic Development Minister Claudio Scajola told reporters in Luxembourg on 6 June.

Austria, Luxembourg, Cyprus and Malta are backing Rome’s proposal.

Italy is also urging the EU to “speak a realistic language” with respect to biofuels in the context of sky-rocketing food prices. “We will invite ministers to review the target on biofuels to take into account what is currently happening in the world and that cannot be ignored,” Scajola said.

While the EU remains locked in a heated debate over whether or not the biofuels targets should be kept, it is less likely that member states will agree to a rethink on renewable energy target calculation, according to Schäfer.

“There is no serious debate on the numbers,” he said, pointing to a broad political consensus among EU countries on the issue.

The member states’ proposals, which were not discussed in any detail during the 6 June Energy Council due to the discussion being dominated by the issue of energy market liberalisation, will now be discussed by the Council’s working groups.

euractiv.com

10 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky