[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Japanese firm buys up wind project 

The much-delayed Bald Hills wind farm in Victoria, notorious for being rejected due to a perceived threat to the orange-bellied parrot, has been sold to Japanese interests.

And the proposed cost of the project has blown out to $300million, with the wind farm now scheduled to operate from 2011, five years after former environment minister Ian Campbell caved in and belatedly approved the project.

Japanese company Mitsui has acquired 100 per cent of the shares of Bald Hills Wind Farm Pty Ltd, a special-purpose company that held the development rights for the planned 52-turbine project near the southern Victorian town of Wonthaggi. Melbourne company Wind Power Pty Ltd confirmed the deal to The Australian.

Wind Power director Andrew Newbold said the company planned to enter into an agreement with Mitsui to assist in the project’s construction.

It also expected to manage the facility once it was built by the end of 2011.

In December 2006, Senator Campbell backed down and approved the project – eight months after blocking it over an alleged threat to the orange-bellied parrot.

Senator Campbell had previously overruled advice from his own department and blocked the wind farm, citing risks to the endangered bird.

It was revealed, however, that the predicted frequency of an orange-bellied parrot fatally colliding with turbines was, at worst, once every 1000 years.

Changes trumpeted by Senator Campbell did not substantially alter the project, and serious doubts remained about whether the orange-bellied parrot was ever under threat from the wind farm. The company was required to move only six of the 52 turbines that had been within 2km of the coast – the parrot’s potential migratory path.

By the time the project was approved, its cost had blown out by $30 million to $250million.

Mr Newbold said the estimated cost of the facility was now $300 million. He defended the deal with Mitsui, saying “basically, we needed an equity partner. The message from Wind Power is we are thrilled with the transaction,” he said.

“We think it’s reflective of our hard work and we’re looking forward to building it to enable the Government to meet its renewable energy targets.”

However, both Mitsui and Wind Power suggested the deal was yet to be locked down. Mitsui said it expected to be in a position to “make a final investment decision” on the project within the next 12 months.

Mr Newbold said Wind Power was “working toward financial close” over the next 10 to 12 months, with construction work to start next year.

“They are obviously making a strategic investment in renewables and we hope to do a lot more projects with them,” he said. “We were never going to own it outright because of the equity required and we will still be assisting in the building process. Moreover, we will continue to manage the facility once it’s constructed.”

Mr Newbold said the drawn-out approval process for the project had been costly.

“What that did was cost us a lot of money, a lot of time and it probably set the company back in its growth path a couple of years,” he said. The company will contribute funding to the recovery plan for the parrot.

Mr Newbold said there had been increasing commercial interest in renewable energy since the defeat of the Howard government last year. “We are getting a call a week now from both local and international investors looking to invest in renewables since the change of government.”

Ewin Hannan

The Australian

9 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky