LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Federation hits at lack of consultation over windfarm plans 

The National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisatons (NFFO) has voiced “disappointment and dismay” at the announcement by the Crown Estate on proposed sites under round three for offshore renewable energy development.

The NFFO says it has repeatedly expressed concern to Government departments on the lack of consultation at the primary stages of site selection. Dialogue at an early stage could substantially reduce the cumulative effects on fishermen from loss of access to prime fishing grounds to other offshore activities.

But the proposed developments announced in round three opens large new areas for development but seem to suggest that nothing has been learned from the first two rounds.

“As a consequence, more prime and very productive fishing grounds will be lost to offshore renewable energy developments when these could have very easily been sited elsewhere.”

Dave Bevan, NFFO Liaison Officer added:

“Like some sites under rounds one and two, a number of new and bigger sites under round three have been selected in prime fishing areas.

“Not all sea bed is highly productive fishing ground and therefore some local sensitivity in siting these new wind farms could have been avoided through closer consultation with fishing representative’s and communities at the primary planning stages of round three. Second stage consultation between fishermen and potential operators is seen as meaningless due to the fact that government has also placed restrictions on how much a wind farm site can be moved from its original proposed position.

“The detail of this recent announcement therefore calls into question the benefit of fishing representatives attending the FLOWW-Fisheries Liaison Offshore Wave and Wind-group. It suggests that government simply want the fishermen’s notional attendance to endorse these controversial decisions.

“Furthermore, there are new sites proposed for the East Irish Sea under round three where the cumulative impact of existing offshore developments is already making it increasingly difficult for the local fishing industry to operate.”

fishupdate.com

9 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky