[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm gets experts’ backing  

RSPB experts have given their blessing to proposals for a new wind farm to be built on the site of the Bleak House open cast mine.

There were fears that migratory birds would be killed by the three proposed propellors, but the RSPB has concluded that the wind farm is “unlikely to impact” on bird populations and should be allowed to go ahead.

Andrew Waters, the RSPB’s public affairs officer for the West Midlands, told The Post that the society had been consulted about the project and have given it the all clear.

“We studied the Bleak House application particularly carefully as Cannock Chase is good for birds, being inter-nationally important for nightjars.

“With that in mind we looked carefully at any issues that there might have been. Having done this we decided not to object to the proposed wind farm.”

Mr Waters stressed that the RSPB are only able to oppose a scheme based on tis potential impact on birds and not the potential impact to the landscape, which he said was a matter for the planning authority.

He added that the RSPB support renewable energy, but Birds like this nightjar are at home on Cannock Chase have a duty to examine the potential impact of technologies such as wind and wave power on vulnerable species.

“In principle we are positive about natural energies – climate change is the greatest threat to birds, so we have to strike a balance.

“We know from other wind farms what the impact of this development is likely to be. Birds can just as well fly into a house as into a wind turbine and the death of one bird which is as likely to have died in winter will not make a major difference to population levels.”

icCannock

29 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter