[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Count the cost  

Jim Roth’s business viewpoint column (“Oklahoma wind power has vast potential,” May 8), provided food for thought. Indeed, there is a great deal of potential benefit in generating electrical power from wind resources in our state if all natural resource costs are taken into account.

Construction of the enormous infrastructure needed to transform wind energy into electricity and move the power to market can have profound negative impacts on native habitat and wildlife resources. Some direct mortality can occur when birds or bats collide with rotating turbine blades or lines and towers, but by far the greatest impact comes from the displacement of prairie species by the tall structures, roadways, power lines and other development features associated with wind power generation and transmission. Another threat is for species such as the lesser prairie-chicken, which has declined to teetering on the precipice of listing under the Endangered Species Act.

Unfragmented, native prairie habitat simply is in ever-decreasing supply. Agriculture, unsustainable grazing practices, oil and gas exploration and production, fire suppression, road construction, encroachment by eastern red cedar and other woody plant species, and now placement of wind power related infrastructure all have contributed to the widespread loss of our collective western Oklahoma natural heritage, and led to greatly decreased populations of sensitive, yet iconic wildlife species.

A partial solution to this dilemma does exist. By placing wind power related structures within already disturbed sites, much of the natural resource impact and cost can be avoided. Such enlightened action can entail some increased up-front economic expense. So, the question becomes one of foresight versus short-term, economic expediency and continued natural resource decline. The potential benefits of wind power are valid, so long as all costs are counted.

Jerry J. Brandbander, Tulsa

Editor’s note: Jerry J. Brandbander is a field supervisor with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

Tulsa World

25 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter