[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Windpark plan’s future a divisive topic  

With a recent state Supreme Court ruling in its favor, Energy Unlimited believes its windpark project proposed for Penobscot Mountain is headed forward, but the Bear Creek Township solicitor says a previous court decision has already doomed the project.

On Tuesday, the state Supreme Court denied a petition from a citizens group opposed to the project that challenged a township zoning board ruling. The ruling essentially cemented the company’s assertion that the site near Crystal Lake “is generally a good place to put a wind farm,” said Ed Schoener, a consultant on the project.

“We still have a lot of land development issues to work out, but the zoning is finished,” he said, conceding that had the decision been reversed, the project would have been in trouble.

That’s a brighter outlook on the project than township solicitor Bill Vinsko has, even with the Supreme Court ruling. “It is dead,” he said. “I’m surprised that they think there’s still a chance for this.”

The company’s original land plan was rejected with about two dozen conditions the company had to satisfy. Before the company could submit a revised plan, the township passed a stricter windpark ordinance and said the company’s new plan would be required to follow the new ordinance. The company argued the new ordinance made its plan impossible.

Energy Unlimited is petitioning the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas to force the township to review its new plan using the old ordinance.

However, Vinsko said that argument was already denied by the Commonwealth Court. He expects the lower court to defer to the higher court’s judgment and dismiss the company’s case.

The company hopes to install 34 turbines, which would have a maximum capacity of 54 megawatts, or enough to power 16,000 homes, Schoener said. Because wind is intermittent, though, the park would likely average about a third of that maximum production.

By Rory Sweeney
Staff Writer

The Times Leader

24 May 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter